NTT-AT WinActor vs Tungsten RPA comparison

NTT DATA and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. NTT DATA is ranked #39, while Tungsten Automation is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. NTT DATA holds a 0.8% mindshare in RPA, compared to Tungsten Automation’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of NTT DATA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

NTT-AT WinActor

Read 2 NTT-AT WinActor reviews

621 Views
590 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 27 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,845 Views
1,707 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

NTT-AT WinActor

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Tungsten RPA and NTT-AT WinActor compete in the robotic process automation sector. WinActor is perceived as having the upper hand due to its robust feature set justifying a higher investment.

Features: Tungsten RPA features seamless integration with existing systems, user-friendly scripting tools for non-programmers, and an emphasis on cost-effectiveness. NTT-AT WinActor offers advanced automation features, customizable workflows, and the capability to handle diverse business processes efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tungsten RPA provides a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive support services, ensuring minimal disruption. NTT-AT WinActor's deployment model may require specialized assistance but is supported by an extensive training program, crucial for using its advanced features.

Pricing and ROI: Tungsten RPA is recognized for affordable setup costs and a quicker ROI due to lower initial expenses and ongoing support. NTT-AT WinActor demands a higher initial investment but delivers significant ROI through capabilities that save time and resources in long-term projects.

To learn more, read our detailed NTT-AT WinActor vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NTT-AT WinActor vs. Tungsten RPA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NTT-AT WinActor

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

39th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tungsten RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of NTT-AT WinActor is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tungsten RPA is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tungsten RPA	2.0%
NTT-AT WinActor	0.8%
Other	97.2%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1170825

IT Planning Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked

Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks. It would be better if, when we have scheduled a scenario, it would log into the system automatically.

Read full review

Mahmoud Alyabroudi

Solutions Architect at DEWA

A n automation solution with OCR and scanner

Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release. Firstly, The first level of support needs enhancement. When you open a ticket with Tungsten, they inquire about various aspects of the issue. The initial support level should involve conducting a Webex meeting to address and assess the reported issues within the environment directly. This would involve thoroughly checking the issues and logs, among other relevant factors. It may require a minor configuration adjustment that could be resolved promptly during the session. There are several challenges associated with Tungsten RPA. Firstly, there is often a perception issue among employees who may believe that RPA is intended to replace their jobs rather than enhance efficiency. This misconception can hinder the adoption of RPA solutions in the workplace, as employees may resist the implementation of automation technologies. Secondly, there have been challenges related to integrating Tungsten RPA with applications built on Java. Many issues have been addressed and resolved in V11.3, thus improving the compatibility of Tungsten RPA with Java-based applications and major challenges.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."

"NTT-AT WinActor has allowed our employees to focus on other things rather than the repetitive tasks that can now be given to the robot."

"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."

"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."

"The solution is scalable."

"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."

"It is a stable product."

"If you don't have a computer science background, you can easily use Tungsten RPA because this is a low-code platform and it is easier than other RPA tools."

"The scalability of Kofax is very handy, because with a few clicks you can have your scalable environment up and ready and it is not so complex to configure the entire environment."

"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."

"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."

"The HR and IT areas of the product need to be improved."

"There have been a lot of issues we have had that have taken weeks, if not months to fix and the support is not satisfactory."

"The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers."

"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."

"The technical support must be improved."

"The process discovery could be a bit better."

"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."

"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."

"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

I am not a user of Tungsten RPA; I sell this product for our company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

The negative side is that UiPath has a really large community on the RPA side, and Tungsten RPA doesn't have any community for the developer side, which is a red flag for us and for customers.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kofax RPA?

Tungsten RPA reduces manual work, especially in financial services and HR solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 14% of the time

Nintex RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 12% of the time

TIS RPA vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism Cloud vs NTT-AT WinActor

Compared 7% of the time

More NTT-AT WinActor Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 32% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

WorkFusion vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

March 2026

Download NTT-AT WinActor product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

March 2026

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

NTT DATA

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

Exeo Tech Corporation

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

NTT-AT WinActor vs. Tungsten RPA

March 2026

Free Report: NTT-AT WinActor vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about NTT-AT WinActor vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NTT-AT WinActor vs. Tungsten RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.