We performed a comparison between NTT-AT WinActor and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."
"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."
"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."
"Its stability has been good."
"Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow."
"They are leaders in the same industry."
"It helped cut short the release cycle by almost 40% compared to the previous solution."
"The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience."
"Pega is also broadening its landscape by building on top of PRPC (CRM, EPC, etc.), and with a cloud offering available, it is a genuine contender to compete with Salesforce."
"It is a good and matured solution."
"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."
"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."
"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."
"They have tied the deployment with the Pega BPM product, the robot manager. You need to have the BPM installed."
"I feel like it doesn't get updated frequently enough. There aren't a lot of new features or a clear roadmap for future improvements."
"Rule versioning and deployment to enable parallel development could still be improved"
"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently."
"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."
"The ease-of-use could be improved."
"The way integration classes are created could be improved."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
NTT-AT WinActor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 10th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews. NTT-AT WinActor is rated 7.0, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of NTT-AT WinActor writes "Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". NTT-AT WinActor is most compared with UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.