We performed a comparison between Blue Prism and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The object design way of implementing things actually brings a lot of reusability for us because you can design your objects once and leverage them in multiple automations."
"We have integrated the product with our centralized infra-monitoring tool, which gives us real-time insights into BOT health and also the health of the underlying resources."
"As a developer, I liked the layout and UI, specifically referring to testing. I was able to watch the process through stages."
"The only good thing about Blue Prism is the execution speed."
"Blue Prism is a great enterprise and it has offered the solutions that I have been needing in order to give my organization an RPA."
"The automation on offer is great."
"The solution is way more efficient for debugging than other tools."
"I use the basic features that are very useful."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The solution is scalable."
"I would like to see a cloud version of Blue Prism available. Both cloud and on-premise options would be beneficial, as they would reduce maintenance costs. I'm using the Blue Prism desktop, which is still in the initial stages. I want enhancements in the Object Explorer and Application Model features to ensure stability in upcoming versions. I have suggested a few ideas, such as incorporating triggering mechanisms, but I haven't seen them implemented yet."
"Optical character recognition has room for improvement."
"The solution can be improved by switching off data DB and including a report section."
"Occasionally, there may be stability issues where certain nodes begin to behave erratically and produce errors."
"From a monitoring perspective, the way the screens are set up, or the reporting within Blue Prism, is not really user-friendly. You need a technical person to basically put that up. It's not necessarily easily viewable."
"Blue Prism is not very flexible when it comes to integrations."
"This solution is lacking attended automation, which is the worst thing about this solution."
"The control room is still the desktop version, which restricts access. You can't really access it from anywhere."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "
Blue Prism is ranked 4th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 85 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Blue Prism is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Blue Prism writes "Way more efficient for debugging than other tools but the UI is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Blue Prism is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Pega Robotic Process Automation and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA), whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), SAS Data Management and ABBYY Vantage. See our Blue Prism vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
