Pega Robotic Process Automation Reviews

Excel connectors need to be improved as there are a few connectors in Excel areas. The recording is not at best in Pega Robotics. They could look into it. The interactions with some applications, like Windows and web applications, are a little slow. They need to improve their speed. It should be normal, to open it with other tools. However, right now, it's a little hard. Users should feel they can develop easily. It will sometimes hang while interacting with third-party applications. Instead of adapters, if we had direct interaction of the applications with API and had scripts, that would be better. We have only CSharp supported right now. We'd like to have Python supported. If it was, it would be easier for us and make the solution more flexible. Currently, we are adding three different configuration files, however, if I had the option, I'd prefer to make a single configuration file and then differentiate it in all three environments. It can be difficult to create logic in automation. It's hard than if we used other RPA tools. If they could add more toolbox options, that would be ideal. They need to do what they can to help us reduce complexity in the automation and combine things under, for example, a single control.

There aren’t many areas for improvement. The process itself was really fine. There was no unnecessary jargon and unnecessary steps. In one of the past projects, however, I observed they made it unnecessarily complex by, let's just say, exporting a screenshot at the end of each step which was cumbersome - especially when you could just save it in a drive locally or a shared drive. Extra necessary steps just make the automation complex. You really need to think out the process and simplify as much as possible to avoid complexity. I would like to see some features improved that are already in there. One thing is the ease of deployment. They have integrated the deployment. They have tied the deployment with the Pega BPM product, the robot manager. You need to have the BPM installed. On top of that, you need to install this robotic manager solution. I understand that they want to tie their products together and make customers use both or all of their products in one suite; however, it can be annoying. It makes things unnecessarily complex. It would have been great if they just provided a standalone deployment system. Features-wise, I'd like to see the OCR Optical Character Recognition. Pega is way behind its competitors in terms of OCR implementation and OCR capabilities. I'd like to see that improve. I haven't personally tried out many OCR solutions, however, on a proof of concept level, we did a few things and there is significant room for improvement there.

What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently.