No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Teams vs Pexip comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
177
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (2nd)
Pexip
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pexip is 1.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams2.9%
Pexip1.3%
Other95.8%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
Have streamlined daily workflow and task management but still face inconvenience from recent interface changes and limited integration options
There are challenges and issues in Microsoft Teams, such as after recent updates where group chats were combined with Teams, chats, and groups into one. Users have to work with settings to make it normal again so Teams are separated from chats, and that was a really inconvenient update. Many users ask me to help make it back again to separate Teams and groups from one-to-one chats. That's probably the worst update they've made recently. Additionally, there are some minor features, such as when I work with messages, I don't have an actual forward or quote option when replying to someone's message. I need to be careful not to miss the quote sign. For a lot of people, they are confused about where the quotes option is. I've received a couple of hundred support tickets just regarding this issue. The function to share email to Teams chat doesn't work sometimes due to our compliance policies, and sometimes it would be nice to be able to forward an email to the group chat and have further discussions. Microsoft Teams could improve by being less glitchy because it glitches a lot, leading to undelivered emails and undelivered messages. It would be beneficial if the MS application Shifts, which adds functionality to groups, could be integrated into the groups calendar. Currently, many teams don't use the app because it is not integrated with the general calendar or the Outlook calendar, making it basically a useless application. The platform needs less Copilot and more people. The general Copilot integration into the platform is less glitchy, but Microsoft Teams is quite heavy and glitchy sometimes. Stability depends a lot on compliance restrictions, policies, and quality of internet. Sometimes, when updates are enrolling, the platform glitches, breaks, or shuts down.
reviewer1438284 - PeerSpot reviewer
Account Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Well-priced, user-friendly, and offers many great features
The solution is too big, too vast to really wrap your head around everything. There are too many directions it can go in. There aren't too many negatives. It's been an overall positive experience. Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have. This would dictate the license capacity you need to buy. The product could offer better backgrounds, or the ability to change the background.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The platform has facilitated our communication and collaboration, especially in a remote or hybrid work environment."
"Arranging online meetings is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams."
"The most valuable feature for us is the Teams Planner module."
"This solution is great for ad hoc video conferencing. It's so easy to start a meeting."
"All the functions I needed were supported very well, making the product very effective."
"I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings."
"The features of Microsoft Teams I find most useful for team productivity are mainly the screen sharing feature, along with recordings and automatically generated transcripts when we do recording."
"It's easy to share information and upload and download files on Microsoft Teams."
"It offers the most call control, the most CVI, and the best GDP area in European regions."
"The solution offers a very user-friendly experience."
 

Cons

"The solution's recording could be improved because it is not as good as other products."
"The desktop and mobile apps are quite different."
"On rare occasions, it freezes and some people will lose sound or they could lose video."
"Microsoft Teams is quite demanding on bandwidth, which has been a problem during the COVID situation because we don't get enterprise-class bandwidth at home."
"Web conferencing needs improvements."
"I think it would be helpful if the whiteboard tool was embedded in the solution rather than having to deploy or download a tool for this."
"In the next release, I would like to have the interface modernized and brought more up to date."
"I think the solution would be improved by giving people the ability to call into meetings."
"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."
"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
"Its pricing is reasonable."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"The solution has a reasonable price in the market."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"The tool's price is high. We purchase Microsoft Office 365 on per user basis and we get support also on that basis."
"We have a license for the solution."
"The solution's pricing is average."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
886,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Construction Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
24%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise71
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Regarding the license, the Microsoft 365 license I am taking is quite expensive, and every year it goes higher. The solution is expensive for Microsoft Teams as well.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
I installed Microsoft Teams on my laptop and phone. I faced a scenario where I disconnected the call from my laptop, but sometimes the call still came through on my phone. Sometimes this is making ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
PayPal, Nordea, Vodafone, Spotify, Intel
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: March 2026.
886,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.