Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pexip vs Zoom Workplace Business comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pexip
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zoom Workplace Business
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
226
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Pexip is 1.7%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoom Workplace Business is 15.0%, up from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Zoom Workplace Business15.0%
Pexip1.7%
Other83.3%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1438284 - PeerSpot reviewer
Well-priced, user-friendly, and offers many great features
The solution is too big, too vast to really wrap your head around everything. There are too many directions it can go in. There aren't too many negatives. It's been an overall positive experience. Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have. This would dictate the license capacity you need to buy. The product could offer better backgrounds, or the ability to change the background.
Luiz Kazan - PeerSpot reviewer
Utilizing versatile features for efficient personal and work meetings
Zoom offers a number of interesting and valuable features. One of the most interesting is the ability to share only audio and provide ambient music without sharing a screen. The breakout room feature is much more developed than other solutions, allowing users to stay in the same meeting and move to different rooms and back to the main room. The sharing features are great for projecting people who should be in focus. Another valuable feature is the virtual entrance, which uses a username and password recognized by the Zoom system, showing the person's full name and ID. Additionally, the use of video and a good fixed background improves visibility compared to other applications. These features differentiate Zoom from others.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution offers a very user-friendly experience."
"Screen sharing is valuable. It is very easy to install, and there are 45 minutes free of charge."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of Zoom are simplicity and reliability."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is very stable."
"A good option for online meetings."
"There have been no stability issues or downtimes."
"With Zoom or Teams, it is very easy to share content and the ability to conduct reviews is beneficial."
 

Cons

"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."
"The product's interface needs enhancement."
"The security of the solution could improve."
"I do not like Zoom as much as Microsoft Teams. I am not sure what is better about Zoom."
"Excessive software updates can sometimes disrupt my experience."
"Sometimes the free version is limited to forty-five minutes. For students, it would be beneficial to have access through the university for longer meetings."
"The only thing that I can't get to work well is putting one of those little fancy wallpaper picture screens behind me during meetings so that I don't show my house or the room I'm attending from. Everyone is basically working remotely at this point. It would help to just have a neutral professional background for meetings that's easy to add."
"The voice quality could improve, and there are issues with the background."
"The tool could be more user-friendly, especially for finding options to present screens."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Zoom, which is expensive in our part of the world."
"In addition to any licensing fees, we hired Zoom to provide training to us in small groups."
"Zoom can be used for free."
"We generally have a strict budget so the pricing for Zoom is reasonable."
"The cost of Zoom is approximately $150 USD annually."
"I use the free version of Zoom."
"I am using the free version."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Performing Arts
14%
Educational Organization
11%
University
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business97
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise101
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
LucidChart vs LucidSpark for brainstorming sessions over Zoom
Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zoom?
Zoom offers a free version for up to forty minutes.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PayPal, Nordea, Vodafone, Spotify, Intel
Fortinet, Veeva, Proofpoint, Box, Ticketmaster, Trend Micro, Caesars Entertainment, Santa Clara University, Pandora, Stanford Continuing Studies
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: October 2025.
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.