We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a service from Microsoft, so it will scale."
"A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure."
"I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution."
"It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools."
"It is a robust, stable product."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."
"Azure Monitor is really just a source for Dynatrace. It's just collecting data and monitoring the environment and the infrastructure. It is fairly good at that."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"The solution's monitoring feature has limitations for analyzing multiple metrics."
"This solution could be improved with more out-of-the-box functionalities and artificial intelligence to complete event correlation."
"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration."
"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."
"Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced."
"Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy."
"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with . See our Azure Monitor vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.