We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and NetSuite OneWorld based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of the market."
"It is a scalable solution. There are more than 5,000 end users in my organization."
"It is easy to use, and it works very well for small-scale companies."
"The security feature, particularly the encryption, which still builds sensitivity, is one of the most valuable features."
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"It's quite reliable, and there's a good local provider who can adapt the solution for tax issues."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics NAV is its simplicity of accounting and receiving reports. The solution is similar to Microsoft Excel, and that similarity is good. All the functions of Microsoft Dynamics are user-friendly."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Utilizes best practices that are simple to implement."
"NetSuite is a great solution, fast to bring up and makes everyone's life easier."
"NetSuite OneWorld is a single instance that allows you to do different business functions, such as reporting, order-to-cash, design-build, and procure-to-pay. This feature is what's most valuable in the solution."
"Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"Inventory management in NetSuite OneWorld is one of the best in the industry, so this feature is what I like most about the solution."
"Embedded business intelligence is a valuable feature. There is also no need to wait for extract functions, and each transaction is reflected in the system dashboards in real time."
"The ability to customize it to create custom fields that are reportable, and then to be able to write script behind it to automate other processes that might otherwise be manual is great."
"We've set up Jira integration and used robotic process automation (RPA) to streamline various processes, like procurement and invoicing. Some processes still require manual approval, like supplier invoices, but we're simplifying those too. We're also exploring integrating with other tools like Power BI for better data analytics and reporting. Currently, our automation focuses on general tasks, not document understanding or anything complex like that."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV could improve the reporting."
"I would like to improve the tool’s reporting and coding part."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV will be replaced with Office 365 in the future."
"I would like to have more frequent updates."
"The product should improve work optimization."
"Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central has been buggy in my experience and they should improve in this area. Additionally, there are too many updates. The updates involve a whole bunch of applications as part of the package, such as the Edge browser. The updates are too broad across the whole package of applications."
"The solution is stable, but it could improve."
"Certain analytics features are missing that I've come to expect from other systems. Additionally, there are occasional issues with data accuracy that need to be addressed. Overall, deeper analytics capabilities would greatly improve the tool's usefulness for me."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"In NetSuite OneWorld, what needs improvement is the production planning functionality."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
"Some entities are not available for multiple subsidiaries, which requires duplication."
"Project collaboration through Dashboard Business Management and Relations Management is easy to perform, but it does need to be worked on as it is difficult for customers, suppliers, and internal users to use."
"The Project Management User Interface is lacking."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
More Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is ranked 3rd in ERP with 62 reviews while NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 14th in ERP with 13 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is rated 8.2, while NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central writes "Easy to deploy, extremely stable, and highly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, SAP Business One, SAP ERP and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S/4HANA. See our Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs. NetSuite OneWorld report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.