What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics NAV?

I would rate the pricing of Business Central as a six or seven out of ten in terms of costliness. We have yearly licensing costs, and the biggest additional expense is for external consultants.

You have to pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

The solution's license is costly compared to other CRM tools.

There are two types of licenses. One is the essential license in which everything is covered, and the next is the premium. If your company is a manufacturing or service management company, then you can go for the premium license because those two modules are the premium ones. You can manage your manufacturing activities and your service activities.

We have an agreement with Microsoft and pricing is okay for us.

The price of the solution could be reduced to improve their offering.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is a more cost-effective option for entry-level users. Firstly, there is no need to purchase user licenses, unlike GP which costs around $3,000 per user. Instead, Business Central charges a monthly fee of $70 to $100 per user. Although the recurring cost may add up over time, it is not a substantial up front expense like GP.

The tool’s licensing is yearly. The solution is cheaper compared to other ERP products from Oracle or SAP.

I give the solution a seven out of ten for pricing. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is cheaper than some others. In addition to the license, we pay for third-party support.

The price of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is reasonable.

The license changes every year. Sometimes it's for fixed users, and sometimes it's for concurrent users.

The licensing is reasonable. They also provide data management and recovery via backups. I'd rate the affordability seven out of ten based on the costs in the Pakistani market. Local partners will charge for implementation, which could be an extra cost for a company.

Licensing costs are competitive and fair. I believe we pay somewhere around $80 to $100 per month for a license.

Licensing is okay. License subscription prices are okay.

The deployment cost us $70,000 and we pay around $18,000 annually for support, which we find to be expensive.

I would rate the pricing of this solution at three out of five.

Its licensing is yearly. In addition to the licensing cost, there is the cost of hosting on Azure.

The cost is one of the benefits. If you don't want to go for the full-blown finance and operations, the pricing model is a lot cheaper and has now switched to being based on a per-user subscription. So, if it's on cloud, you now have an expense instead of a large CapEx. If it's on-prem, you obviously still have to continue with the licensing model that they have, but if you compare the features and functionality, in terms of the price that you pay, I find it's better than other products. My answer on the pricing would be slightly different, depending on the country you're in and the return on investment, based on the size of the company. It's well-priced internationally. I think the new model is priced even better because it's now subscription-based and, if you go for cloud, the return on investment is a lot quicker and if it's expense, you can cap it. If you do take the on-prem version, the licensing is still priced as what it used to be, so that would depend on what country you are in.

NAV might be a little pricey for a small or medium-sized company, but all the solutions out there are.

Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a pay-as-you-use payment model.

I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure.

The price of the solution is reasonable.

I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud.

The price of the solution is reasonable. You can pay for a license at set intervals. For example, monthly or annually.

The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive.