OpenText LoadRunner Professional and ReadyAPI are competitors in the performance testing category. LoadRunner seems to have the upper hand with its robust protocol support and scripting flexibility, while ReadyAPI stands out for its ease of use and integration with CI/CD pipelines.
Features: LoadRunner Professional offers extensive protocol support for comprehensive testing and a flexible scripting environment that allows custom code creation. It includes advanced analytical features for detailed evaluations. ReadyAPI provides a user-friendly interface for API testing with capabilities for functional, load, and security testing integrated into a single platform. It supports a variety of API types and integrates well with CI/CD processes.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner's complexity and cost are areas of concern, with a need for improved integration with cloud environments and cost-effective pricing models. ReadyAPI could benefit from enhanced scripting flexibility and expanded reporting functionality, along with improved cloud integrations and scalability. Enhancing protocol support to go beyond REST and SOAP services may also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner requires detailed setup and benefits from community support but has varied customer service experiences depending on representatives. ReadyAPI is noted for simpler deployment and has generally positive feedback on its customer service, though improvements in scalability would benefit larger setups.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner is seen as expensive with a complex licensing model, yet its features can justify the expense for in-depth analysis, suggesting strong ROI over time. ReadyAPI, with its more straightforward and affordable pricing, offers flexibility in feature selection, making it an attractive cost-effective choice for enterprises focused on comprehensive API testing without sacrificing performance.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
Overall, the installation was quite easy since OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) is SaaS-based.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is a versatile tool for creating multiple testing frameworks and validating various parameters seamlessly.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| ReadyAPI | 3.3% |
| Other | 84.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
