Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
3,876 views|2,596 comparisons
SmartBear Logo
7,023 views|4,690 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and ReadyAPI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, SeleniumHQ, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: December 2022).
655,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros →

"The two most valuable features we use are the functional test and the security test.""The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are the ready-to-use assertions and filters which can perform the validation. If we want to filter out any value, the filters are available. Apart from that database integration, if you want to go ahead and perform validation in the database layer it is possible with the ready-to-use feature available. The execution and reporting are rich features.""The initial setup is straightforward.""It is the best solution you can get across the globe for API, test automation, and API penetration testing.""The most valuable feature has been the assertion as a test step as this has allowed us to increase the scope of testing and validation.""I haven't seen any other tool that offers both types of tests. This is very helpful for us, and it's one of the main reasons why we chose this service.""ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data.""It can create stress tests very fast, and some features help you do it fast."

More ReadyAPI Pros →

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons →

"ReadyAPI can improve because it is limited to only SOAP and REST services. They should update the solution to include more protocols so that other people are not limited to SOAP and REST services. Other than would be able to utilize it.""ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time.""Areas for improvement include the security files, endpoints, and process sessions.""I don't like how they don't have a clear way to manage tests between multiple projects.""Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions.""ReadyAPI could improve by adding a conversion tool from one file type to another. Import support for multiple file types would be beneficial.""It is challenging doing upgrades and patches because sometimes the environmental variables or suits in the projects get erased.""Can be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation."

More ReadyAPI Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of the solution has been fine."
  • "The price was around $6,000 for one license, but I don't remember exactly. It is definitely expensive. Our organization was planning on having multiple licenses for this year."
  • "For each license, they charge the same amount, which is less than $1,000 for each desktop license."
  • "The thing with ReadyAPI is that you have to buy different licenses for different purposes."
  • "We have approximately 12 licenses in place. There are other solutions that are more expensive than ReadyAPI that have more features, but if the scope of the project is limited to SOAP and REST service, then this is the best option."
  • "It is expensive. Each user needs to be licensed, and there are different licenses within the product. It starts with 750 euros for a single user per year, but for the full product features, you need to pay a lot more. There are three versions. This cost is for functional testing, and then there is a cost for load testing and virtual services. If you want to use these areas with the functional test license, you are limited. You hit some limits in these functions. If you have all three licenses, then you have full functionality for the API."
  • "We pay $3,000 annually for a floating license. actually. That allows another person from my company to use it as well. It's a cloud-based license."
  • "If I remember correctly, ReadyAPI costs between $5,000 to $7,000 for five thousand virtual users running it at a given point in time. Other tools, for example, Apache JMeter, can run millions of users at a given time. ReadyAPI is a tool that requires you to pay more money if you want more users to run it for performance testing. For functional testing, each ReadyAPI license costs $1,000, and you do get basic testing, and it's inclusive of one hundred users. In my company, if there's a need for more than one hundred users, my team uses Apache JMeter because it's futile to end up paying $5,000 or $6,000 annually just for performance testing, which can be done in Apache JMeter as well. Given the circumstances, my team does performance testing only towards the end of the fiscal year when the regulatory testing of applications takes place. If I have to run ReadyAPI just for two days or just for ten or fifteen odd days, then it's not worth paying $5,000 for the license with the small number of users provided by ReadyAPI."
  • More ReadyAPI Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    655,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
    Top Answer:We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
    Top Answer:In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that… more »
    Top Answer:It's easy to learn how to use it.
    Top Answer:Licensing costs are yearly. There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more.
    Top Answer:Version control does not work well. It's has a git API which is defective and doesn't work well with our version repository, Bitbucket. We do all version control using git bash (command line driven)… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Ready API
    Learn More
    Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

    ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.

    ReadyAPI Features

    Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:

    • Continuous integration
    • Comprehensive dashboard
    • API discovery
    • Central, standardized reporting function
    • Plugin architecture
    • ReadyAPI Projects
    • Multiple options for scripting to create functional, load, or security tests

    ReadyAPI Benefits

    Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:

    • Easy and flexible test creation and execution: ReadyAPI has visual editors and wizards that make testing easy, saving time and simplifying onboarding.

    • Test APIs continuously: With ReadyAPI you can run consistent tests on local environments, Docker containers, or other distributed staging environments.

    • Team friendly: ReadyAPI enables software teams with the ability to easily share testing projects and artifacts, share licenses between team members, and report issues directly from the testing IDE.

    • Powerful, data-driven testing capabilities: With ReadyAPI, you can save time by checking for numerous real world conditions.

    • Supports multiple specifications, schemas, and protocols: ReadyAPI includes legacy SOAP services, microservices powered by Apache Kafka, and mainstream REST services, as well as IoT use cases leveraging MQTT. It allows you to test and virtualize the most popular API protocols and also to import APIs from specifications and schemas instantly.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.

    PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”

    An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."

    Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.

    They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”

    Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
    Learn more about ReadyAPI
    Sample Customers
    Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
    Healthcare Data Solutions (HDS)
    Top Industries
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Insurance Company21%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Logistics Company7%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Insurance Company11%
    Company Size
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    December 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, SeleniumHQ, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2022.
    655,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while ReadyAPI is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 20 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while ReadyAPI is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, ReadyAPI Test, Coverity and Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, whereas ReadyAPI is most compared with ReadyAPI Test, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca and Tricentis NeoLoad.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.