Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs ScienceLogic comparison

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,294 Views
2,104 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant are products designed to enhance network management and performance. Marvis seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and capability to provide a better return on investment, making it attractive despite potentially higher costs.

Features: ScienceLogic offers asset discovery, monitoring capabilities, and comprehensive reporting tools. It provides real-time visibility across digital infrastructure. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant stands out with AI-driven insights, predictive analytics, and intuitive interaction capability, facilitating proactive network management.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve its AI functionalities, enhance user interface design, and expand its integration capabilities. Marvis could improve its cost structure, increase customization options, and extend integration with third-party applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a streamlined deployment process with substantial technical support and flexibility in integration with existing systems. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant embraces a straightforward cloud-based deployment model, emphasizing intuitive setup and strong personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic presents competitive setup costs with efficiency in resource management and long-term operational savings. Marvis, while potentially higher in initial cost, demonstrates significant value through enhanced network optimization and AI capabilities, suggesting superior ROI in technology-driven environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: December 2025).

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. ScienceLogic

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), AIOps (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.1%
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at a transportation company with 11-50 employees

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

"The integration of ScienceLogic with our existing IT ecosystems has significantly benefited our organization, as all alerts now directly go to IBM Netcool and then to the ITSM tool, ServiceNow."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"They need a little more self-service."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

22%

Retailer

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Comparisons

Compared 38% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 27% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 23% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 13% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

January 2026

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell