InfluxDB and OpsRamp are competing in monitoring and infrastructure management. InfluxDB takes a lead in real-time analytics and time-series data, whereas OpsRamp excels in comprehensive infrastructure management.
Features: InfluxDB provides scalable architecture, efficient handling of time-series data, and fast query capabilities. OpsRamp offers extensive automation tools, comprehensive dashboarding, and robust incident management features.
Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could enhance its dashboard capabilities, expand its use case scenarios, and improve its incident management integration. OpsRamp might better streamline its complexity, reduce its steep learning curve, and add more focused analytics features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfluxDB offers straightforward deployment with minimal configuration needs. OpsRamp involves a more detailed setup, but provides dedicated support options ensuring effective management.
Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB is cost-effective for businesses prioritizing time-series data, delivering good ROI for such needs. OpsRamp might have higher initial costs, but offers a significant long-term ROI with its extensive management capabilities.
InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.
It is important to stick with available features and provide customers with clear, precise details about what can and cannot be done to avoid anomalies.
I find the licensing model convenient and clear enough, and I have seen a return on investment with OpsRamp.
Having a dedicated firefighter team for each MSP would be beneficial.
The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.
We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.
InfluxDB's scalability is fine for me; I gather a lot of metrics and have not had any issues.
It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.
After integrating Kafka, it never broke again, as Kafka handled messages and metrics appropriately, decreasing the message throughput.
It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.
InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.
It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.
Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.
Technical support should be improved.
We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for InfluxDB was great, as I did not use any license.
it does not strike me as expensive, and the licensing model is clear enough.
InfluxDB has positively impacted my organization by solving a monitoring problem that we had, coming up with a solution since we did not have any monitoring system, allowing us to build one from scratch.
InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.
It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.
I have utilized OpsRamp's capability for predictive analytics, and it has been important in fostering collaboration between my IT and development teams under DevOps methodologies, where applicable.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| InfluxDB | 0.5% |
| OpsRamp | 2.0% |
| Other | 97.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.
InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.
InfluxDB offers its users:
InfluxDB Benefits
There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.
Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”
OpsRamp is a leading cloud-based digital IT operations management platform. The solution allows your organization to leverage hybrid observability, process automation, and machine learning to modernize IT operations. OpsRamp can handle the speed, scope, and scale of modern IT and can help you drive productivity and business value. In addition, it can help your business manage, monitor, and consolidate your point tools and applications.
OpsRamp Features
OpsRamp has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
OpsRamp Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing OpsRamp. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
