Inflectra SpiraTest vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Inflectra and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Inflectra is ranked #10, while Siemens is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. Inflectra holds a 0.6% mindshare in ARM, compared to Siemens’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Inflectra SpiraTest

Read 25 Inflectra SpiraTest reviews

215 Views
34 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Polarion Requirements

Read 14 Polarion Requirements reviews

2,593 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Inflectra SpiraTest

Polarion Requirements

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Polarion Requirements and Inflectra SpiraTest compete in the requirements management category. Though Polarion is favored for pricing and support, Inflectra's extensive features make it a worthwhile choice.

Features: Polarion Requirements offers link tracing, book entry, and collaborative tools, making document management easy for complex projects. Inflectra SpiraTest integrates test cases, defect tracking, and provides customizable reporting, benefiting holistic test management.

Room for Improvement: Polarion can enhance its API flexibility, simplify document generation, and improve folder structure organization. Inflectra could focus on enhancing integration ease, provide better training resources, and optimize its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polarion Requirements features a flexible, customizable deployment with strong documentation. Inflectra offers both cloud and on-premise options, alongside responsive, personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: Polarion's setup cost is higher, suiting large enterprises seeking advanced features. Inflectra's cost-effective model delivers a faster ROI with its robust feature set, appealing for moderate budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Polarion Requirements Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Polarion Requirements

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra SpiraTest

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (25th)

Polarion Requirements

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Inflectra SpiraTest is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion Requirements is 14.5%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Jason Lopez

Test Manager at a engineering company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Intuitive enough and easy to learn, but in terms of folder organization, it could be better

Inflectra SpiraTest is the new kid on the block compared to Jira and Azure. Still, when I started exploring the tool, I realized that it was no different from other tools I've used in the past, but it all boils down to adaptability because the features would always be more or less the same. I found Inflectra SpiraTest intuitive enough. It's also easy to learn, so this is what I like about it.

Read full review

Effendy Mohamed

Principal Instrument and Control at Petronas

Positive impact on traceability while user interface and setup require improvement

The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor. The user configuration had some issues; you need to know all the details, so it's not really friendly for those who are not IT savvy. Someone who has a good IT background would be able to use it, but a regular person who just knows more or has always been dealing with Microsoft Word might find it difficult to use that system. Users need skills to work with this solution and also need to have some foundation of why those technical integrations and cross-referencing have to be done in such a way through systematization, which makes it difficult and not straightforward through the visibility of the user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user-friendly features are the most valuable. For example, migration of requirements and migration of test cases and the creation of traceability. You have various reports that you need. The plug-ins that are available to connect with the other tools."

"The reporting functionality helps vendors and technical resources identify bugs and issues that need to be addressed. The simple dashboard-style home page makes training end-user testers simple and straightforward. The actual testing UI is VERY straightforward and very intuitive for the end-users that test the system since very often we pull from business and operational users to help test new systems."

"The features of this product most valuable to me were the test case management and the visual status, by which it was displayed."

"We were able to add a step-by-step procedure for someone to follow to assist in testing."

"The ability to reuse test cases already used across projects is the most valuable feature of this solution. We don't need to create new ones."

"Inflectra SpiraTest has a lot of functionality, which is good."

"I found Inflectra SpiraTest intuitive enough. It's also easy to learn, so this is what I like about it."

"The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively."

"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."

"The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good."

"We worked with the web interface."

"I like the way this solution is structured."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good."

More Polarion Requirements pros

Cons

"Migrating is not very easy. It depends on the organization, how efficient and effective the decision-making process is. The plug-ins should be easier and more integrated rather than the user trying to integrate the tools which are more popular, like Jira et al."

"The user interface is slightly complicated and not very consistent. It could be more user friendly."

"Being able to add scripting for testing can and does save a lot of time. When you are able to just ‘run’ a test case rather than manually add it and run it."

"The UI for managing test cases, test sets, test runs could be a little more integrated, currently, these feel disjointed at times and confusing. Also, the test steps page needs to display the test steps closer to the top of the UI so as to not have to scroll down to find."

"It should develop integration with JIRA. We have some complexities which caused us not to decide to integrate it with our JIRA, like synchronous data."

"The folder organization in Inflectra SpiraTest could be better, though I cannot comment whether that is structure-related. Most of what I need would probably be in the tool, but as a test manager, I need to be able to create dashboards and reports easily."

"Two areas that can stand improvement: integration with third party products and making it more intuitive."

"If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable."

"The usability of the solution should also be improved."

"The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor."

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."

"It is not a stable solution, as we had issues with shared licenses."

"We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools."

"The platform's review process for the documents could be better."

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users."

More Polarion Requirements cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was excellent. I would recommend the enterprise solution."

"I Googled the pricing for Inflectra SpiraTest, and it's about $4,000 annually."

"The product's price is high."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

31%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polarion Requirements?

I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Inflectra SpiraTest

Compared 100% of the time

More Inflectra SpiraTest Competitors

IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 55% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 20% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 11% of the time

Jira vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 10% of the time

Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 3% of the time

More Polarion Requirements Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra SpiraTest

June 2025

Download Inflectra SpiraTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion Requirements

June 2025

Download Polarion Requirements product report

Also Known As

SpiraTest, Spira

No data available

Overview

SpiraTest is an integrated Requirements and Quality Management solution that manages your project's Requirements, Test Cases, Releases, Defects and Issues in one environment, with complete traceability throughout. After defining your project's requirements, you generate the test cases and test steps that validate the functionality. The test execution modules allows users to run through the tests, logging defects/issues as they go. SpiraTest is Fully Web-Based. Free 30-Day Trial.

Inflectra

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.

Siemens

Sample Customers

- Morningstar - Deutsch Bank - Sopra Group - Booz Allen & Hamilton - UBS - US Government

NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Polarion Requirements

June 2025

Free Report: Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra SpiraTest vs. Polarion Requirements report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.