"It is good at requirements management and test management."
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."
"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."
"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."
"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."
"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."
Earn 20 points
Jama Connect is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 2 reviews while Polarion Requirements is ranked 8th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. Jama Connect is rated 6.6, while Polarion Requirements is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "Reasonably priced, stable, user-friendly, and has good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Good flexibility, good price, useful APIs, and very stable". Jama Connect is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Polarion ALM and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Helix ALM and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.