Jira vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Atlassian and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Siemens is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Atlassian holds a 12.4% mindshare in ARM, compared to Siemens’s 15.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 277 Jira reviews

13,526 Views
2,299 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Polarion Requirements

Read 14 Polarion Requirements reviews

2,509 Views
2,509 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Jira

Polarion Requirements

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Polarion Requirements and Jira are project management and requirement tracking tools. While Polarion shines in structured requirement management, Jira is preferred for its flexible, agile project management features, giving it an edge due to its extensive integrations.

Features: Polarion emphasizes traceability, customizable workflows, and linked work items, making it suitable for regulated industries. Key features include link tracing, sequence training, and book entry. Jira excels with agile boards, third-party integrations, and customizable dashboards. Key features include issue and bug tracking, powerful API integrations, and agile boards.

Room for Improvement: Polarion could improve its integration ease with third-party tools and enhance its user interface for more intuitive navigation. It could also benefit from a wider range of pre-configured templates. Jira could improve in handling large datasets without performance issues and enhance support for complex project setups. It lacks automatic capacity planning and advanced workload forecasting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polarion offers an on-premises deployment option with dedicated customer support, ideal for controlled environments. Jira is cloud-based, backed by extensive online resources and community support, aligning well with teams needing scalable access.

Pricing and ROI: Polarion involves a higher initial setup cost, justified by its depth in requirements management. Jira's subscription model is cost-effective, allowing quick deployment and ROI, making it appealing to startups and agile teams.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. Polarion Requirements Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. Polarion Requirements

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,435 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

277

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Project Management Software (1st)

Polarion Requirements

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Jira is 12.4%, down from 15.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion Requirements is 15.7%, up from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jira	12.4%
Polarion Requirements	15.7%
Other	71.9%

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Effendy Mohamed

Principal Instrument and Control at PETRONAS

Positive impact on traceability while user interface and setup require improvement

The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor. The user configuration had some issues; you need to know all the details, so it's not really friendly for those who are not IT savvy. Someone who has a good IT background would be able to use it, but a regular person who just knows more or has always been dealing with Microsoft Word might find it difficult to use that system. Users need skills to work with this solution and also need to have some foundation of why those technical integrations and cross-referencing have to be done in such a way through systematization, which makes it difficult and not straightforward through the visibility of the user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can use Jira Query Language (JQL) to write queries to see the stories that are there for the current sprint. I can also sort them by assignment. I also use Jira is for burndown charts, which give an indication of how efficiently the squad is performing. I also use the Active Sprints function and a feature called Planning Poker."

"It's easy to escalate the issues to the product development team."

"We can cope with processes easily without adapting the tool, but adapting the tool to processes."

"We use Jira mostly for task coordination and assignment. Additionally, scrum methodologies defined work items and bug issues. If we create any bugs all of them are fixed."

"It includes by default all the necessary tools for a project manager to work and make their work more efficient."

"The dashboard and reports tracking and the setup updates quickly, I am very impressed with those features. Additionally, it is user-friendly."

"The burndown charts help track projects."

"Jira is very useful for project management for internal projects."

More Jira pros

"We worked with the web interface."

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"I like the way this solution is structured."

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs."

"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."

"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now."

"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."

More Polarion Requirements pros

Cons

"They are not supporting in-house servers anymore and I think I've got until January to port this to something else."

"Jira could provide more insight into sprints such as how did we perform in the last sprint compared to other sprints. It would be helpful to have metrics and a dashboard feature for others to see."

"Jira could improve the workflow, screen, and field configurability. They are lagging behind other solutions, such as Allegra in work system configurability."

"We would like to see the integration of a lite-version of Confluence, just to manage some of the templates and documents."

"Whenever you edit a story, whatever you have changed takes a bit of time to save."

"I find the dashboard to be Jira's most problematic feature."

"It would be ideal if the solution could be available as a mobile application."

"I don't know whether there is a Jira problem or a test risk problem, however, sometimes, we face issues on fetching the reports."

More Jira cons

"The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor."

"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually."

"It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts."

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."

"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."

"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."

"We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools."

More Polarion Requirements cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are a regional research and education institute. We're using the free license provided for educational institutes."

"The price of Jira could be lower."

"We have a corporate license, and it is probably based on the number of people."

"The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra."

"If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive."

"We make use of the solution free of charge."

"The license is yearly. It is a large, long-running program."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. The product offers flexibility in pricing since it depends on the memory bits you have used."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"The product's price is high."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

29%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	105
Midsize Enterprise	56
Large Enterprise	150

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polarion Requirements?

I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Jama Connect vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Jira Competitors

IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 71% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 12% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 7% of the time

Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Dimensions RM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 1% of the time

More Polarion Requirements Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

January 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion Requirements

December 2025

Download Polarion Requirements product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

No data available

Overview

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. Polarion Requirements

December 2025

Free Report: Jira vs. Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. Polarion Requirements report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.