IBM DOORS and Inflectra SpiraTest compete in requirements management and testing. SpiraTest typically has an advantage due to its pricing and wide range of features.
Features: IBM DOORS provides excellent requirements traceability, impact analysis, and customizations via the Dynamic Extension Language (DXL). SpiraTest offers a comprehensive test management suite, easy setup, and intuitive reporting with strong integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: IBM DOORS needs better integration and user-friendliness, with criticisms regarding its outdated interface. SpiraTest users desire more report flexibility, enhanced integration guidance, and a modernized interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DOORS is mainly deployed on-premises, whereas SpiraTest offers deployment on both public and private clouds, providing greater flexibility. IBM receives mixed feedback on customer service, while SpiraTest users generally find their service efficient and helpful.
Pricing and ROI: IBM DOORS has a complex licensing model suitable for larger enterprises but delivers high ROI in large projects. SpiraTest is considered more affordable, offering excellent value for smaller teams, with a strong reputation for cost-efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM DOORS | 30.1% |
| Inflectra SpiraTest | 1.0% |
| Other | 68.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 36 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS (DOORS) is a Requirements Management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It provides a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating communication and collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis, ensuring effective implementation and testing. DOORS improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and supports better decision-making through clear visibility into requirements. Compared to its newer, web-based counterpart DOORS Next, the mature DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features with a traditional user interface but lacks web-based functionality and modern integration with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
