OpenText Application Quality Management and Inflectra SpiraTest compete in the software quality management category. OpenText has the edge for large enterprises due to its comprehensive feature set, while SpiraTest is favored by smaller teams for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Features: OpenText's strengths include a vast feature set supporting Application Lifecycle Management, a centralized repository for all testing data, and integration capabilities with other tools. SpiraTest offers robust reporting, easy integration for managing test cases, and flexibility with various customization options.
Room for Improvement: OpenText users call for an updated interface, better integration with agile tools, and improved reporting. Its high pricing also raises concerns. SpiraTest could improve on integration with third-party tools and enhance its user interface to meet current technological standards.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides diverse deployment options like on-premises and hybrid clouds but faces criticism for complex deployment and less efficient customer support. SpiraTest's straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service are often praised.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText, though expensive, is seen as offering substantial ROI for extensive implementations due to its comprehensive capabilities. SpiraTest attracts with its competitive pricing, cost-efficiency, and potential high ROI, making it a practical choice for smaller teams and budget-conscious organizations.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 9.0% |
| Inflectra SpiraTest | 2.0% |
| Other | 89.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
Inflectra SpiraTest is a comprehensive test management tool offering integration with popular platforms, supporting traceability from requirements to execution, and aiding new users with an intuitive, customizable interface for effective defect tracking.
SpiraTest provides users with powerful integration, reporting flexibility, advanced test case management, and cross-platform automation that streamline complex processes. While users desire improvements in interface friendliness and reporting, SpiraTest's seamless integration with tools like Jira demonstrates its utility in managing test cases and tracking defects efficiently. Additional user feedback emphasizes the need for enhanced performance, flexible test case handling, and better guidance for integration utilization, indicating opportunities for future development.
What are SpiraTest's most valuable features?In industries like healthcare, SpiraTest emerges as a valuable repository for testing cases against software builds, ensuring reliable system performance. Its capability to integrate seamlessly with numerous plugins, especially with Jira, proves crucial in planning migrations and strategic decisions, benefiting businesses with its stable and mature platform.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
