Incredibuild vs Jenkins comparison

IncrediBuild and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. IncrediBuild is ranked #26, while Jenkins is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. IncrediBuild holds a 1.4% mindshare in BA, compared to Jenkins’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IncrediBuild users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

Incredibuild

Read 1 Incredibuild review

744 Views
744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

7,083 Views
6,941 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Incredibuild

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Incredibuild and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub and others in Build Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,495 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Incredibuild

Ranking in Build Automation

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Incredibuild is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 9.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jenkins	9.1%
Incredibuild	1.4%
Other	89.5%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Zvika Moskovitz

DevOps Team Leader at Elbit Systems Ltd

Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company

We are using the Incredibuild agent to run multiple processes on all available cores. This is the improvement that we did. Instead of the machine's core doing task after task, it is now running on multiple machines. In my working environment, it is saving time for all our developers in regards to the time consumption of the builds. My team has four people who manage and interact with Incredibuild as a product.

Read full review

Jamshaid I

Principal Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient resource allocation and robust workflow with autoscaling capabilities

In Kubernetes, we use node-based architecture with nodes and pods and follow practices like RBAC and rollback. Multiple pods can run concurrently. We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."

"For each build that runs where I need to generate a code, it takes around half an hour instead of an hour and a half."

"Jenkins is very easy to use."

"From a deployment perspective, we don't require any passwords or any permissions and all, everything we can do from Jenkins, and whenever something fails we have the facility to check the logs so we can find the solutions and fix things, plus the initial setup is simple, the stability is good, the dashboards are very good, the solution has been very easy to use, and it offers very good, very clear documentation that is laid out well and easy to explain to a new user."

"A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for."

"Jenkins is particularly valuable since it saves time by automating manual tasks."

"There are a large number of plugins available for integration with third party systems."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration between different tools."

"Jenkins has allowed for streamlined automated testing, building, and smoke testing of release candidates."

"I like the business logs. It's a very useful tool. Client-server communication is also very fast."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."

"The solution can be improved by introducing a handbook describing the variety of plugins that are available and what each one is used for."

"We would like to see the addition of mobile simulators support to this solution, as part of its open-source offering. We currently have to carry out manual testing for these platforms."

"They need to improve their documentation."

"I think the logs could be improved so that anyone using the build for the first time gets a better view as to how it's performing, what the data is, and what processing is occurring."

"Jenkins is an open-source solution, and people tend to stay on the same version for a long time. When you look for an answer on Google, you often find something that doesn't relate to your implementation. The plugins are both the aspect of Jenkins and also one of the worst because the plugins can have different versions, so it's hard to figure out how to solve the problems."

"In my opinion, there is an issue with the scalability. After Jenkins has big count of jobs, it begins to lose performance and you need to start one more server with a separate Jenkins and migrate some jobs there."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market."

"Jenkins could improve in areas related to Kubernetes and Docker container integration, like machine allocation of nodes and Marshaling integration improvements."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing and licensing are annoying. Every year, I need to renew. If I miss the deadline date, all my processes will stop working. So, I would prefer that I wouldn't need to renew every year, instead have another solution for it. Or, if we could have an enterprise license agreement with the company, then the development team wouldn't need to spend time renewing licenses."

"It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."

"It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly."

"The pricing for Jenkins is free."

"Jenkins is open-source, so it is free."

"This is an open-source solution for the basic features. However, if an organization wishes to include specific functionality, outside of the basic package, there are extra costs involved."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jenkins?

I do not have any notes for improvement.

See all answers

Comparisons

TeamCity vs Incredibuild

Compared 26% of the time

EngFlow vs Incredibuild

Compared 22% of the time

Bazel vs Incredibuild

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs Incredibuild

Compared 8% of the time

CircleCI vs Incredibuild

Compared 5% of the time

More Incredibuild Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2026

Download Incredibuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

June 2026

Download Jenkins product report

Overview

Incredibuild accelerates development processes by leveraging distributed computing power, enabling faster build times and improved efficiency for complex software projects. It provides a robust platform for developers looking to optimize productivity in demanding environments.

Incredibuild enhances the speed and efficiency of software builds by distributing tasks across a network of machines, effectively minimizing bottlenecks. By harnessing idle processing power, it significantly reduces build times, making it a valuable tool for developers who face stringent deadlines and complex projects. The platform is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing development environments, providing a solution that is easy to implement while delivering powerful performance improvements. Incredibuild's architecture ensures scalability and reliability, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to enhance their build processes.

What are the key features of Incredibuild?

Task Distribution: Leverages a network of computers to distribute workloads efficiently.
Scalability: Easily scales with the growth of development needs.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with existing development tools for smoother operation.
Performance Monitoring: Provides tools to monitor and optimize performance.

What benefits and ROI should you expect from Incredibuild?

Reduced Build Times: Accelerates build processes saving time.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure costs by using existing resources.
Increased Productivity: Frees developers from waiting on slow build cycles.

In technology-driven industries like gaming, finance, and automotive, Incredibuild accelerates software build processes, enabling faster innovation and time-to-market. It allows companies to scale development efforts efficiently without a hefty investment in additional hardware, providing a competitive advantage in rapidly evolving markets.

IncrediBuild

Jenkins is an open-source automation server known for its extensive plugin ecosystem and seamless integration with a broad range of tools, enhancing CI/CD processes.

As an automation server, Jenkins streamlines development workflows by managing continuous integration and deployment with powerful pipeline support and distributed build capabilities. Its strong community backbone and ease of use contribute to its ongoing appeal. While highly versatile, Jenkins can encounter scalability and plugin management issues, with areas like cloud integration and security needing attention. It supports automation for build, test, and deployment, ensuring smoother software delivery and infrastructure management across environments.

What are Jenkins's key features?

Extensive Plugin Ecosystem: Allows seamless tool integration.
Open-Source Nature: Backed by a strong community.
CI/CD Optimization: Streamlines development workflows.
Pipeline Support: Facilitates complex scripting.
Distributed Build Management: Efficiently handles multiple environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort.
Scalability: Adapts to growing project needs.
Integration Versatility: Works well with tools like Git.
Community Support: Offers practical solutions and resources.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex automation processes.

Jenkins is implemented in industries focused on continuous software delivery and infrastructure management, including technology firms, finance sectors needing robust deployment pipelines, and enterprise environments requiring complex workflow automation. Companies leverage its automation to enhance productivity and minimize errors in development processes.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Over 2,000 companies worldwide across industries inluding Epic Games, Microsoft, Playstation, Nintendo, Samsung, GM, Intel, CitiGroup, Qualcomm, Boeing, Motorola, Qt, and more accelerate their development and enhance their devs’ productivity with Incredibuild.

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.