Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SWIFT InterAct comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SWIFT InterAct
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
11th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is 13.3%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SWIFT InterAct is 1.9%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services13.3%
SWIFT InterAct1.9%
Other84.8%
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

RT
Seeburger Lead EDI Developer/Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Effective business process handling with some room for improvement in mapping ease and user interactions
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services does not have specific issues that need improvement. While each product, like SeeBurger and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, has its own advantages and disadvantages, I do not see any challenges or improvements needed. Although, mapping might be a bit easier in SeeBurger compared to IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services.
VK
Swift Administrator at OTP Bank Hungary
Reliability and integration ease enhance messaging efficiency
The most important feature and the reason we use it is the reliability. It's incredibly reliable. We have never experienced any problems worth mentioning. It is quite easy to monitor and check. We are satisfied with the service. While many questions would be better answered by business personnel from the back office, from our perspective, we are satisfied with it. The support for this service is perfect. We frequently have technical questions, not just about future upgrades, and the support is exceptional. We have numerous subsidiaries that can access the case manager on the SWIFT side, and everyone is satisfied with this. The system is straightforward to install and upgrade. It's crucial to upgrade all patches and hotfixes, and the process is quite simple.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Media Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
65%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services does not have specific issues that need improvement. While each product, like SeeBurger and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, has its own advantages and d...
What is your primary use case for IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?
My primary use case is using IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services ( /products/ibm-sterling-b2b-integration-services-reviews ) for business process modeling and mapping tasks. These tasks are simil...
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?
I would rate IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services a seven. The main reason for this rating is that SeeBurger is much easier to handle compared to IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services. Features li...
What needs improvement with SWIFT InterAct?
As IT professionals, we don't have extensive knowledge about the messages or the financial aspects of this subject. This is a complex system, and we primarily understand the IT component rather tha...
What is your primary use case for SWIFT InterAct?
We are administrators of all sorts of SWIFT solutions, including SWIFT InterAct and FIN. We are SWIFT administrators utilizing various solutions for reaching SWIFT. We use SAA, SAG, AGF, boxes, and...
What advice do you have for others considering SWIFT InterAct?
We use swift.com for administration purposes. As SWIFT administrators, we primarily use it for administration to reach swift.com. Regarding compliance, we use various solutions, but the one integra...
 

Also Known As

No data available
InterAct
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Seceti
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Informatica, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.