IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

IBM and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. IBM holds a 15.7% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...

Read 9 IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services reviews

1,697 Views
1,307 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 33 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,792 Views
1,555 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

SAP Process Orchestration and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are competing products for enterprise integration needs. SAP Process Orchestration is favored for pricing and support, whereas IBM Sterling's features often justify its cost due to robust B2B transaction management.

Features: SAP Process Orchestration offers seamless integration with SAP applications, supports various messaging protocols, and provides robust process automation capabilities. IBM Sterling focuses on comprehensive B2B integration, superior transaction management, and scalability. SAP Process Orchestration is preferable for SAP-focused environments, while IBM Sterling suits diverse global B2B networks.

Room for Improvement: SAP Process Orchestration could enhance its flexibility outside SAP environments, improve non-SAP application integration, and simplify configurations. IBM Sterling could optimize deployment time, reduce complexity in partner ecosystem management, and offer more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Process Orchestration simplifies deployment within the SAP ecosystem but may require SAP-specific expertise. IBM Sterling offers flexible configurations and extensive support for intricate B2B processes, with a reputation for addressing B2B integration challenges efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Process Orchestration's costs align with standard enterprise solutions, providing a better ROI for SAP-centric companies. IBM Sterling requires a higher initial investment due to its features but can deliver substantial ROI for businesses needing advanced B2B transaction management.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,481 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is 15.7%, up from 12.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 7.5%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Joshua Rule

Senior Integration Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Comes with real-time integration suite and best security

We use the product in an integrated environment where the client needs a variety of different file transfer protocols as well as an integrated file translation service IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services offers the best security. The product's most valuable feature is the real-time…

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is extremely scalable."

"The product's most valuable feature is the real-time integration suite."

"They have best-in-class, quality support."

"We are able to monitor all B2B messages, and we are able to see or track each message on it from an error perspective. That's a good side of it. It is working well, and we're able to do our current job."

"They have multiple features for each kind of task and issue. The company has different channels to give information to the administration. Security and integration capabilities are also important. This product has helped to replace a lot of other solutions, saving time and cost."

"IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is a stable and scalable product."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."

"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

"I rate the product's setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy since it is a very easy process."

"Overall, I would rate SAP Process Orchestration a 10 out of 10."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The performance of data processing has increased."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"The only weaknesses they have different governance for each task and different channels for communication which are hard to maintain. The relation of the company with other companies can be improved. We have a lot of customers who this platform for the interchange of information which can also be improved. The compliance information about banks can also be updated."

"Onboarding on the solution is complex. It's hard to onboard partners and customer suppliers. It's one aspect that is not that straightforward."

"They can improve APIs because they are still lagging behind in API connectivity. With non-API connectivity, they're market leaders, but API connectivity, they're still in the immature space."

"It can be now classified as a legacy system because there are no more updates. From what I know, there will be no updates for the current version, which is an issue. Therefore, we are looking for a compatible new software that we can use. We're currently researching what is there in the market. We would consider something that would give us better speed on our current processor. There is also room for improvement in terms of its scalability and GUI. It is an old system, and its scalability can be improved. Its GUI can also be more appealing."

"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

"The solution could be more scalable."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."

"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."

"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."

"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a little bit on the higher side because they give you the best support. Out of ten, I would rate pricing at seven or eight."

"They have a good pricing system, in relation to powerful features."

"The tool is expensive because of its rich features."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?

The product's most valuable feature is the real-time integration suite.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?

The tool is expensive because of its rich features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services does not have specific issues that need improvement. While each product, like SeeBurger and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, has its own advantages and d...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP solutions are generally expensive. SAP Process Orchestration was integrated with SAP ECC in a package, but my customers have consistently described it as an expensive product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

The user interface of SAP Process Orchestration should be more modern to enhance its appeal. It can seem complicated and outdated to new users. Additionally, the tool relies on Java, which feels le...

See all answers

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 17% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 17% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 13% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 12% of the time

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

July 2025

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services report

Download IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

June 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are designed to alleviate the burden on internal resources by providing secure connectivity and collaboration with your customers, suppliers, and business partners. The solution is built on the cloud-based B2B integration and visibility capabilities of IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network and provides comprehensive service offerings for partner onboarding, B2B process management, and trading partner support.

Facilitate growth by rapidly growing and adapting your B2B community without burdening internal resources and capital
Reduce B2B total cost of ownership by reducing the cost and increasing the reliability of B2B operations

Accelerate B2B collaboration with global customers and suppliers by leveraging our B2B expertise.

IBM

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.