SWIFT InterAct vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SWIFT Logo
950 views|830 comparisons
SWIFT Logo
1,071 views|877 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SWIFT InterAct and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use SWIFT InterAct?
OleksiiShcherbatiuk
Ranking
Views
950
Comparisons
830
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,071
Comparisons
877
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
InterAct
Learn More
Overview

Online and mobile platform for financial service providers that enables consistent interaction between back office and contact center.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Sample Customers
Seceti
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm59%
Computer Software Company9%
Retailer4%
Manufacturing Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm59%
Computer Software Company8%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer4%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise81%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise83%
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SWIFT InterAct is ranked 7th in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFT InterAct is rated 0.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". SWIFT InterAct is most compared with , whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with .

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.