We performed a comparison between SWIFT InterAct and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Earn 20 points
Online and mobile platform for financial service providers that enables consistent interaction between back office and contact center.
FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.
FIN value-added processing includes:
It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.
SWIFT InterAct is ranked 12th in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 11th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFT InterAct is rated 0.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 0.0. On the other hand, SWIFT InterAct is most compared with , whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with .
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.