Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Statseeker comparison

IBM and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. IBM is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.5, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
IBM SevOne Network Performa...
Read 54 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews
  • 3,796 Views
  • 1,974 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 900 Views
  • 855 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

IBM SevOne NPM and Statseeker are competing products in the network performance management category. IBM SevOne NPM appears to have the upper hand in data processing capabilities, whereas Statseeker leads in cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment.

Features: IBM SevOne NPM is known for advanced analytics, extensive data integration abilities, and robust reporting capabilities. It effectively supports vast network infrastructures. Statseeker is distinguished by its lightweight architecture, efficient real-time monitoring, and rapid data collection for quick insights.

Room for Improvement: IBM SevOne NPM can improve by simplifying its deployment process, reducing operational complexity, and streamlining user interface interactions. Statseeker could enhance its feature set, expand analytics capabilities, and improve integration options for larger-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SevOne NPM offers a scalable deployment model for large enterprises but may require significant effort for full implementation. Its support services are comprehensive, requiring specialized expertise. Statseeker offers quick deployment with minimal resource demands, known for its responsive customer service that facilitates fast issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SevOne NPM may have higher setup costs, provided its extensive capabilities justify the investment for detailed analytics and large-scale operations. Statseeker offers a more affordable solution with faster implementation, appealing to those prioritizing cost-efficiency with rapid ROI. Its financial outlay is generally lower, attracting budget-conscious organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM SevOne Network Performa...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
42nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (40th), Log Management (44th), Cloud Monitoring Software (30th)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
63rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)1.0%
Statseeker0.4%
Other98.6%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1543041 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1543041
Network monitoring engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Provides consistent infrastructure monitoring with excellent usability and support
The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastructure's availability and ensure that alerts are generated when needed The most valuable features of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) are its stability,…
Read full review
JE
John Elhariry
Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices
One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Based on my experience, the stability of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is excellent."
"SevOne has rich API capabilities, giving us the flexibility to control what we collect and customize the collection, creation, and manipulation of now metrics as necessary."
"The out of the box reports and workflows are pretty good and they meet our requirements well."
"In 90% of the cases, new devices are plug-and-play, so when a new version comes out then SevOne has support for it out of the box."
"The most valuable feature as of late has been the API integration with ServiceNow."
"Scalability. I have never had to worry about how to handle really big environments."
"Data Insight reporting tool is the most valuable feature. They came up with it a couple of years ago. The most pleasing factor is the dark theme. You don't have a white background. It has templates that you can create for all kinds of reports that you can hit on the fly. It's much better printing of the reports. If you want to send PDFs to people, the reports are actually decent. Whereas for years, the old architecture of the PDFs was rubbish and even our customers said, "We have to manipulate your PDFs because they all have bad margin breaks. SevOne fixed that a couple of years ago with the new Data Insight. It's fantastic."
"It's given us the ability to create various real-time network performance reports and distribute them to any colleague who can access these reports immediately."
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"Would benefit with the addition of AI modules for proactive data insights."
"The reporting of NMS is good, but it could be better."
"The user management features need to be improved. It would be nice if we had more granular control, or layers of control, out of the box."
"With the administrative management of the appliance, if some object appears from SevOne because something changed in the network or whatever, then as an administrator you will not be aware. If you are using this object in a report, this object will disappear from the report and you will not be aware of it. So, if you have 1,000 reports, you cannot always check these reports everyday to see if objects are missing or information has disappeared. We don't have any information on alerts, saying that something is happening there and maybe we need to take action. If an object was replaced by another one, or if a link was replaced by another one, then the graph needs to be changed because it doesn't exist in the graph anymore. However, we don't have this information."
"In terms of having a complete view of our network performance, I would rate it a nine out of 10. The reason for not giving it a 10 is that there is no packet capture associated with SevOne, but we do have other tools in place to do that."
"You need to plan integrations. That has been the biggest bug with SevOne so far. For the things that SevOne pulls directly, those are easy to understand, modify, and put into the database. For things that need to use the Universal Collector or xStats, you need to plan that stuff well in advance."
"We need to be thinking about streaming telemetry protocols. They already have the port for enhanced visualization, which they already have through Data Insight."
"The tool needs improvement in non-Cisco SD-WAN."
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Prices per license are not huge, but they exist."
"It is inexpensive compared to other monitoring tools."
"For the value that you get from SevOne, it's worth the price. There are a lot of cheaper alternatives on the market, and even free options. But they require more staff, more resources, and engineers with more advanced knowledge of monitoring. That's what makes SevOne worth the price."
"Although I don't have exact details in terms of cost, my experience has been that SevOne is willing to make a deal with the customer."
"Have a bank of licenses, because it is about the number of objects (RAM, ports, CPU, etc.)."
"There are different options available for licensing, with the per-device option being more expensive but more flexible."
"Many tools price things based on the number of KPIs that you're collecting around a device. In many cases, there could be hundreds of metrics that you need to collect. SevOne provides device-level pricing. That gives us the flexibility to turn on, and expand on, the metrics that we're collecting around those devices, without taking a financial hit."
"Choose a SevOne partner who can provide SevOne as a service and can deliver professional services and maintenance."
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice
"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."
"Statseeker is pretty cheap."
"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."
"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."
"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."
"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."
"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Performing Arts
5%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise45
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise34
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?
There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities. It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improv...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SevOne Network Data Platform?
The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) ( /products/ibm-sevone-network-performance-management-npm-reviews ) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastru...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering SevOne Network Data Platform?
To compete with custom-built tools, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) should accommodate the desired features and be timely in the delivery of feature updates. I would rate the overal...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 5% of the time
SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 5% of the time
Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 5% of the time
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 4% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 4% of the time
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 29% of the time
Zabbix vs Statseeker Logo
Zabbix vs Statseeker
Compared 19% of the time
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 15% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker
Compared 12% of the time
Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker Logo
Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker
Compared 12% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
January 2026
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reportDownload IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
January 2026
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Also Known As

SevOne
No data available
 

Overview

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...



IBM
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker
December 2025
Free Report: IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.