Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Statseeker comparison

IBM and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. IBM is ranked #45 with an average rating of 7.5, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 1.0% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.
IBM SevOne Network Performa...
Read 54 IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reviews
  • 3,180 Views
  • 1,717 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Statseeker
Read 38 Statseeker reviews
  • 613 Views
  • 546 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

IBM SevOne NPM and Statseeker are competing products in the network performance management category. IBM SevOne NPM appears to have the upper hand in data processing capabilities, whereas Statseeker leads in cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment.

Features: IBM SevOne NPM is known for advanced analytics, extensive data integration abilities, and robust reporting capabilities. It effectively supports vast network infrastructures. Statseeker is distinguished by its lightweight architecture, efficient real-time monitoring, and rapid data collection for quick insights.

Room for Improvement: IBM SevOne NPM can improve by simplifying its deployment process, reducing operational complexity, and streamlining user interface interactions. Statseeker could enhance its feature set, expand analytics capabilities, and improve integration options for larger-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SevOne NPM offers a scalable deployment model for large enterprises but may require significant effort for full implementation. Its support services are comprehensive, requiring specialized expertise. Statseeker offers quick deployment with minimal resource demands, known for its responsive customer service that facilitates fast issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SevOne NPM may have higher setup costs, provided its extensive capabilities justify the investment for detailed analytics and large-scale operations. Statseeker offers a more affordable solution with faster implementation, appealing to those prioritizing cost-efficiency with rapid ROI. Its financial outlay is generally lower, attracting budget-conscious organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM SevOne Network Performa...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
45th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (43rd), Log Management (42nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (30th)
Statseeker
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
61st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)1.0%
Statseeker0.3%
Other98.7%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Grzegorz Nowak - PeerSpot reviewer
Improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic
We use SevOne to collect and report on network flows SevOne improves infrastructure planning by helping us analyze network traffic. We can look at bandwidth for specific endpoints on the customer's network and analyze traffic to identify issues. For example, maybe some connectors are unavailable.…
Read full review
JE
We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices
One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Data Insight reporting tool is the most valuable feature. They came up with it a couple of years ago. The most pleasing factor is the dark theme. You don't have a white background. It has templates that you can create for all kinds of reports that you can hit on the fly. It's much better printing of the reports. If you want to send PDFs to people, the reports are actually decent. Whereas for years, the old architecture of the PDFs was rubbish and even our customers said, "We have to manipulate your PDFs because they all have bad margin breaks. SevOne fixed that a couple of years ago with the new Data Insight. It's fantastic."
"The network data collection has been very flexible for us. It's been thorough in areas that were lacking. They have a team that I've worked with to add other pieces to it. So if it's missing something out of the box, they work with me to add it. I was able to collect that data. It's not perfect, but it's pretty thorough."
"Another useful feature is that SevOne gives you real-time insights into your network performance. It polls every five minutes. That is important for our customers because there are some network teams that are always monitoring their networks."
"The modules and the performance management reports that come with data insights are two of the most valuable features. I also find the reports for Wi-Fi, Netflow, LAN, and WAN for monitoring to be very good."
"The most valuable feature is the NMS because that's the core of the system. Without the NMS, the other tools aren't that usable."
"I like the tool’s scalability and real-time reports. Earlier, we struggled to give real-time reports to clients. I also like the tool’s deployment model where we can deploy it either on-premises or in-house. We don’t have to carry the data all over the globe. Also, I am impressed with the tool's flow reporting and Wi-Fi."
"SevOne provides support for all universal connectors. They internally work with other data sources to get features implemented. We have an SD-WAN implementation and use other app data to monitor performance. If you pull that data into one centralized location, that is very useful for management."
"One of the most valuable features is the graphs, which you can build instantly. I have used some open-source platforms in the past, but they are not as good. With SevOne, the sampling in the graph can be every few seconds, not just every few minutes, and that's really helpful. It's really fast."
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pros
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."
"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."
More Statseeker pros
 

Cons

"Telemetry is hot these days, and IBM can improve SevOne's support for telemetry correction. Reporting is another feature that could be better. It provides the bare minimum functionality, which is good enough for most engineers, but the management isn't advanced. The new portal provides a much lighter view and better visualization, but the management is not so good."
"We need to be thinking about streaming telemetry protocols. They already have the port for enhanced visualization, which they already have through Data Insight."
"User-friendly, multi-tenancy."
"The reports are easy to configure but they are a bit outdated in terms of appearance and visualization."
"Would benefit with the addition of AI modules for proactive data insights."
"The GUI: both the dashboard/user view and the admin tool."
"You need to plan integrations. That has been the biggest bug with SevOne so far. For the things that SevOne pulls directly, those are easy to understand, modify, and put into the database. For things that need to use the Universal Collector or xStats, you need to plan that stuff well in advance."
"SevOne could improve its flexibility because it isn't fully customizable and its out-of-the-box configuration doesn't cover all use cases."
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) cons
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."
"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
More Statseeker cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is inexpensive compared to other monitoring tools."
"A blocking point is the high upfront cost because it is challenging to get it accepted and the purchase approved."
"For the value that you get from SevOne, it's worth the price. There are a lot of cheaper alternatives on the market, and even free options. But they require more staff, more resources, and engineers with more advanced knowledge of monitoring. That's what makes SevOne worth the price."
"Choose a SevOne partner who can provide SevOne as a service and can deliver professional services and maintenance."
"The tool is not expensive. We were able to negotiate with SevOne on pricing."
"There are different options available for licensing, with the per-device option being more expensive but more flexible."
"Although I don't have exact details in terms of cost, my experience has been that SevOne is willing to make a deal with the customer."
"Have a bank of licenses, because it is about the number of objects (RAM, ports, CPU, etc.)."
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) pricing and cost advice
"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."
"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."
"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."
"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."
"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."
"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."
"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."
More Statseeker pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Legal Firm
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise45
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise34
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with SevOne Network Data Platform?
There is room for improvement in the integration with different vendors and the reporting capabilities. It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improv...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SevOne Network Data Platform?
The primary use case of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) ( /products/ibm-sevone-network-performance-management-npm-reviews ) is network monitoring. It helps to maintain the infrastru...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering SevOne Network Data Platform?
To compete with custom-built tools, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) should accommodate the desired features and be timely in the delivery of feature updates. I would rate the overal...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?
We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Statseeker?
There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Statseeker?
Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Zabbix vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 10% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 8% of the time
Dynatrace vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 8% of the time
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 7% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Compared 7% of the time
More IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker
Compared 39% of the time
Zabbix vs Statseeker Logo
Zabbix vs Statseeker
Compared 26% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker
Compared 18% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker
Compared 17% of the time
More Statseeker Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
October 2025
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) reportDownload IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) product report
Buyer's Guide
Statseeker
September 2025
Statseeker reportDownload Statseeker product report
 

Also Known As

SevOne
No data available
 

Overview

The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.

Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.

For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...



IBM
Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
Techniche
 

Sample Customers

ATOS, Devereux, Spark New Zealand, Access4, Rogers Communication, Lumen (formerly known as CenturyLink)
With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
Buyer's Guide
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker
September 2025
Free Report: IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Statseeker report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.