We performed a comparison between IBM Resilient and Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that the search capabilities are easy to use. The dashboards are good. The reports are good. It is just simple from a deployment standpoint - that was easy."
More Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] Pros →
"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."
"There are shortcomings with IBM Resilient's technical support team that can be considered for improvement in the future."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."
"Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution."
"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
"There are some automated network response portions that we want to turn up."
More Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] Cons →
Earn 20 points
IBM Resilient is ranked 4th in Security Incident Response with 17 reviews while Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response. IBM Resilient is rated 7.6, while Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] writes "Simple deployment with good reports and dashboard". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and IBM Cloud Pak for Security, whereas Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Cisco SecureX, Splunk SOAR and VMware Carbon Black Cloud.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.