OpenText Functional Testing and HeadSpin are prominent competitors in the functional testing tools market. OpenText Functional Testing appears to have an edge with its expansive feature set, while HeadSpin has significant strengths in integration and performance.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports a wide range of browsers, applications, and technologies, allowing for robust GUI and API testing alongside a strong object repository and extensive cross-platform support. HeadSpin's strengths lie in performance testing with unique capabilities like AV box testing for media streaming, and its robust integration with various automation suites.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing can improve in areas of compatibility and memory usage, as well as simplifying scripting and integration within CI/CD pipelines. HeadSpin users point to the need for enhancements in the user interface and better management of latency issues with remote devices.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing primarily offers on-premises deployment, which can lead to complex setups, though customer service is generally positive despite occasional delays. HeadSpin operates mainly in the public cloud, which simplifies deployment, but there's a need for better onboarding and automated support features.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is perceived as having higher licensing costs, justified by its comprehensive feature support across various applications, with ROI dependent on active automation usage. HeadSpin offers several pricing packages, considered expensive, but users find it delivers significant ROI through accelerated test case creation and platform efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.1% |
| HeadSpin | 0.9% |
| Other | 92.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
Headspin is a data science-driven Mobile APM platform that leverages an AI platform to combine global device infrastructure, test automation, machine learning-driven performance, and quality of experience analytics. HeadSpin was founded to answer the demand for a global testing, performance monitoring, and quality of experience (QoE) management platform to assist businesses in ensuring optimal digital experiences across mobile, audio, online, and video delivery channels.
Headspin facilitates seamless collaboration between product managers, SREs, developers, QA/release engineers, and support staff to:
Headspin Features
Headspin has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
More features include:
Headspin Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Headspin. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Headspin stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its easy setup, scalability, and robust customer support. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Abhishek M., Associate Vice President at Onnivation, notes, “A lot of companies that are using other solutions do not get access to the kind of metrics that HeadSpin captures…HeadSpin is highly advanced. It has got all the performance structures to provide visibility into how my app is performing in the real world. It also helps to identify the gaps.”
Shiba S., Automation Engineer at GlobalLogic India, writes, “The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to…They support multiple devices. Plus, they support distribution testing.”
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
