Goliath Performance Monitor vs Icinga comparison

Goliath Technologies and Icinga are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Goliath Technologies is ranked #59, while Icinga is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.7. Goliath Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Icinga’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Goliath Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

379 Views
288 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

3,321 Views
2,957 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Icinga and Goliath Performance Monitor are two competitors in the IT monitoring sector. Icinga has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Goliath Performance Monitor stands out with its superior features.

Features: Icinga includes robust monitoring capabilities, customizable alerts, and seamless integration, making it flexible for various tools. On the other hand, Goliath Performance Monitor provides advanced analytics, real-time performance tracking, and a comprehensive reporting suite, offering extensive insights into IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could enhance its analytics functions, improve real-time tracking capabilities, and offer more straightforward deployment guides. Goliath Performance Monitor might benefit from more customizable alert options, increased integration flexibility with open-source tools, and a more affordable pricing structure for smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga offers flexible deployment options, potentially requiring more initial configuration but allowing for greater customization. Its community-driven support is notable. Goliath Performance Monitor provides a simplified deployment process with strong official support, suitable for quick implementation and reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga presents a cost-effective solution with lower operational costs, attractive for budget-conscious organizations. Goliath Performance Monitor requires a higher initial investment, yet its advanced features can yield a higher ROI for businesses needing in-depth monitoring capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Goliath Performance Monitor vs. Icinga Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor vs. Icinga

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

59th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Icinga

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (15th), Server Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 4.1%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Harrison Bulley

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting

A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification

I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Offers a diversity of features."

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price seems reasonable."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The solution is cheap."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"The solution is free to use."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"It's an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

20%

University

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Icinga?

The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?

It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Icinga?

There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...

See all answers

Comparisons

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 100% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 46% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 21% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 10% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

Centreon vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

May 2025

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

May 2025

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

No data available

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

Goliath Performance Monitor offers proactive, end-to-end IT performance monitoring for Citrix & VMware to ensure a positive end user experience. Goliath Performance Monitor provides complete support for monitoring virtual server, virtual desktop and hybrid cloud environments, and provides specialized modules for certain EMR/EHR applications and NVIDIA GRID vGPU. Goliath Performance Monitor has been architected from the ground up to help IT administrators anticipate end user experience issues, troubleshoot the root cause, and deploy remediation actions quickly before end users complain.

Goliath Technologies

Icinga monitors systems, network devices, infrastructure, and services, helping manage and analyze server resources. It automates ticket incidents and alerting, providing oversight of client Windows and Linux systems.

Icinga offers comprehensive monitoring of servers including CPU utilization and RAM space, facilitating automated incident management and alerting. Frequently deployed on-premises, this monitoring tool is key for managed services providers and organizations to oversee and ensure optimal performance of various environments, including applications like databases and web servers. It provides extensive features for creating custom plugins, stabilization, scalability, and high customization capabilities suitable for different infrastructure needs.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Event Handler: Facilitates automatic self-healing of systems.
Extensive Plugin Library: Offers a wide range of plugins for monitoring.
Ease of Use: Simplifies user experience with an intuitive interface and Icinga Director for easy configurations.
Open-Source Nature: Free to use, modify, and distribute.
Automation Capabilities: Integrates with APIs and Ansible Collections for automation.
Custom Plugins: Users can create and integrate their own plugins.
Stability and Scalability: Provides reliable performance across different scale infrastructures.

What are the benefits or ROI to look for when evaluating Icinga?

Critical Issue Highlighting: Effectively identifies and notifies about critical problems.
High Customization: Offers flexibility for diverse monitoring needs.
Automated Alerting: Reduces manual effort and improves response times.
Extensive Integration: Works seamlessly with other tools and platforms.

Icinga implementations span multiple industries, providing essential monitoring for IT infrastructure in healthcare, finance, and education. Managed services providers utilize Icinga to maintain and monitor client systems across various environments while ensuring optimal performance and compliance. It is highly valued in these sectors for its ability to customize monitoring, improving operational efficiency and reducing downtime.

Icinga

Sample Customers

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor vs. Icinga

April 2025

Free Report: Goliath Performance Monitor vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about Goliath Performance Monitor vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Goliath Performance Monitor vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.