GitGuardian Platform vs Tines comparison

Read 4 Tines reviews

2,826 Views
283 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

GitGuardian Platform and Tines operate in the security and automation space, respectively. Tines appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced automation capabilities offering more value despite GitGuardian's attractive pricing and support.

Features: GitGuardian's strengths lie in secrets detection, safeguarding code repositories, effective audit-log visibility, and real-time alerts. Tines is known for its advanced automation workflows, seamless integration across platforms, and robust API capabilities.

Room for Improvement: GitGuardian could improve its false-positive rate, adjust its sensitivity in detecting test credentials, and offer more granular control over detection settings. Tines may benefit from simplifying configuration to accommodate less experienced users, improving documentation for complex workflows, and enhancing its user interface for smoother navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian is praised for its straightforward integration process and proactive support, making it user-friendly for those with limited technical experience. Tines requires more configuration due to its extensive capabilities but offers comprehensive support to guide users through the process.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian is a cost-effective option with a quick setup and tangible returns on investment from enhanced security measures. Tines, although potentially more expensive initially, justifies the cost with significant gains in operational efficiency and time savings through automation, appealing to those prioritizing advanced automation and process optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Tines Report (Updated: December 2025).

GitGuardian Platform vs. Tines

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Software Supply Chain Security (5th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Tines

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (12th), AI-Powered Security Automation (1st), AI IT Support (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tines is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	1.2%
Tines	0.7%
Other	98.1%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

VikramSingh8

Security Delivery Manager at Accenture

Automation simplifies workflows with no code and excellent support

Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis. Tines has its own dashboard, which displays information like how many stories have been created and how many automations have taken place. However, the reporting and dashboard are not advanced; they are quite basic, with fewer customizable options. The look and feel of the dashboard could be enhanced. Another area for improvement is in terms of documentation, as every tool and company has its own knowledge base.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

"The secrets detection and alerting is the most important feature. We get alerted almost immediately after someone commits a secret. It has been very accurate, allowing us to jump on it right away, then figure out if we have something substantial that has been leaked or whether it is something that we don't have to worry about. This general main feature of the app is great."

"The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement."

"Some of our teams have hundreds of repositories, so filtering by team saves a lot of time and effort."

"GitGuardian Internal Monitoring has helped increase our secrets detection rate by several orders of magnitude. This is a hard metric to get. For example, if we knew what our secrets were and where they were, we wouldn't need GitGuardian or these types of solutions. There could be a million more secrets that GitGuardian doesn't detect, but it is basically impossible to find them by searching for them."

"Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful."

"It actually creates an incident ticket for us. We can now go end-to-end after a secret has been identified, to track down who owns the repository and who is responsible for cleaning it up."

"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The tool was vendor-neutral."

"One of the most valuable features is that it’s a low-code solution."

"The best thing is that it's no code, so it doesn't require coding knowledge."

"The best advantage is the no-code automation, excellent customer support services, and ease of integration with other tools."

Cons

"We'd like to request a new GitGuardian feature that automates user onboarding and access control for code repositories."

"It took us a while to get new patterns introduced into the pattern reporting process."

"One of our current challenges is that the GitGuardian platform identifies encrypted secrets and statements as sensitive information even though they're secured."

"One improvement that I'd like to see is a cleaner for Splunk logs. It would be nice to have a middle man for anything we send or receive from Splunk forwarders. I'd love to see it get cleaned by GitGuardian or caught to make sure we don't have any secrets getting committed to Splunk logs."

"It would be nice if they supported detecting PII or had some kind of data loss prevention feature."

"It could be easier. They have a CLI tool that engineers can run on their laptops, but getting engineers to install the tool is a manual process. I would like to see them have it integrated into one of those developer tools, e.g., VS Code or JetBrains, so developers don't have to think about it."

"Other solutions have a live chat feature that provides instant results. Waiting for an agent to reply to an email is less ideal than an instant conversation with a support employee. That's a complaint so minor I almost hesitate to mention it."

"There are some features that are lacking in GitGuardian. The more we grow and the more engineers we have, the more it will become difficult to assign an incident because the assignment is not automatic. I know they are working on that and we are waiting for it."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"Maybe Tines can add more features and demonstrations, like videos on how to use the features within the tool."

"Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis."

"Tines was a little bit more expensive than Torq."

"They started implementing some AI, and their AI is isolated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"We don't have a huge number of users, but its yearly rate was quite reasonable when compared to other per-seat solutions that we looked at... Having a free plan for a small number of users was really great. If you're a small team, I don't see why you wouldn't want to get started with it."

"We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

What needs improvement with Tines?

What is your primary use case for Tines?

I am Vikram Singh, I work for top service based multinational brand and I am responsible for delivering Tines services. Essentially, I am working on it, and I am leading one of the source services ...

What advice do you have for others considering Tines?

When you start working with Tines, ensure you pursue the Tines certifications. They offer these free certifications when they become your partner. Overall, I would rate Tines a nine out of ten.

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Torq vs Tines

Compared 34% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Tines

Compared 14% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Tines

Compared 10% of the time

Blink Ops vs Tines

Compared 9% of the time

Swimlane vs Tines

Compared 7% of the time

More Tines Competitors

Product Reports

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

January 2026

Download Tines product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

Tines offers no-code and low-code automation for users to automate tasks without coding expertise, integrating seamlessly with APIs to enhance incident management and security operations.

Known for a vendor-neutral approach, Tines provides detailed documentation and live chat support, allowing for effective integration with other tools, scheduling capabilities, and streamlined processes that save time and effort. Users find it intuitive for efficient task handling, making manual intervention unnecessary. Challenges include the need for more comprehensive documentation and instructional videos, as well as improvements in AI integration and reporting aesthetics. Pricing is also noted as higher compared to alternatives.

What are the most important features of Tines?

No-code and low-code automation: Enables task automation without coding knowledge.
API integration: Facilitates enhanced automation for security operations.
Vendor-neutral approach: Promotes unbiased integration across various tools.
Detailed documentation: Provides users with comprehensive guides and support.
Scheduling capabilities: Allows users to automate workflows efficiently.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Tines?

Time savings: Automates tasks to reduce manual processes.
Improved efficiency: Streamlines security operations, enhancing productivity.
Comprehensive task handling: Offers intuitive tools for managing complex tasks easily.

Tines primarily serves organizations in the security sector, automating security operations such as alert detection and managed detection and response. It's utilized extensively in security operation centers for tasks like phishing email processing, ticket creation, IOC investigations, and ticket assignments within enterprise security frameworks, with multiple teams delivering Tines services to enhance task handling efficiency.

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available