GitGuardian Platform pros and cons

Name: GitGuardian Platform
Brand: GitGuardian
Rating: 4.4 (32 reviews)

Vendor: GitGuardian

4.4 out of 5

32 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Pros & Cons summary

GitGuardian Platform offers automatic alerts and broad detection capabilities to quickly resolve issues, enhancing security while reducing remediation time. Developers engage proactively, saving security teams time. A free tier is beneficial for smaller teams, although enhancement in bug-tracking integration, Single Sign-On, and customization for healthcare-specific identifiers is needed. Purchase complexity and frequent false positives, sometimes up to 60%, present challenges, impacting overall user experience despite accurate alerting for expediting remediation.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

GitGuardian Platform allows authors to solve their own problems, reducing remediation time from days to minutes or hours, thus improving visibility and saving resources.

GitGuardian Platform helps develop a security-minded culture by emphasizing shift-left practices, increasing user's mindfulness about code security and the presence of secrets.

GitGuardian Platform's secret detection and alerting capabilities are highly valued for their accuracy and instant notifications, minimizing security violations.

GitGuardian Platform enhances productivity by bridging the gap between security teams and developers, saving time and facilitating automatic remediation by developers.

GitGuardian Platform's real-time secret detection lets organizations protect pipelines and improve data security by monitoring public repositories.

CONS

GitGuardian lacks customization options for healthcare-specific identifiers and currently does not support PII detection or data loss prevention features.

GitGuardian needs improvement in integrating with Splunk logs to ensure secrets are not committed.

There are challenges with integration for Azure DevOps and the bug-tracking system, resulting in insufficient directness and support.

Automatic incident assignment is absent, making it difficult to manage increasing engineer numbers as organizations grow.

There are discrepancies between hook and dashboard scanners, which require better synchronization and fine-tuning.

GitGuardian Platform Pros review quotes

it_user1621659

Chief Software Architect at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees

Jul 8, 2021

What is particularly helpful is that having GitGuardian show that the code failed a check enables us to automatically pass the resolution to the author. We don't have to rely on the reviewer to assign it back to him or her. Letting the authors solve their own problems before they get to the reviewer has significantly improved visibility and reduced the remediation time from multiple days to minutes or hours. Given how time-consuming code reviews can be, it saves some of our more scarce resources.