GitGuardian Platform vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

GitGuardian and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitGuardian is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while GitHub is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.9. GitGuardian holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

5,371 Views
2,471 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,308 Views
7,308 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

GitGuardian Platform and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the realm of secret detection and security integration tools. Based on the comparison, GitGuardian appears to have the upper hand due to its broader detection capabilities and strong customer support.

Features: GitGuardian Platform offers robust secret detection with capabilities like Dev in the Loop for quick remediation, high accuracy in detecting AWS keys, and comprehensive integration options. Meanwhile, GitHub Advanced Security seamlessly integrates into the GitHub ecosystem, providing security scans, dependency scanning, and custom query possibilities via CodeQL to enhance user workflow.

Room for Improvement: GitGuardian Platform could benefit from enhanced customization for industry-specific identifiers and smoother bug-tracking integrations and historical scans. GitHub Advanced Security needs to expand its language support and address API security issues, while also improving updates on open-source vulnerabilities and customization options to cater to broader industry requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian Platform is commended for its comprehensive support, flexible deployment across cloud and on-premises environments, and a highly supportive technical team. GitHub Advanced Security is self-service, integrating well with GitHub, but lacks prominently highlighted customer support services.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian Platform is considered reasonably priced with a free tier for small teams, although potentially costly for larger organizations, but offers positive ROI through time savings in secret detection. GitHub Advanced Security is seen as expensive due to its licensing model but provides significant ROI by preventing costly incidents.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (7th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (5th), Software Supply Chain Security (5th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 5.8%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	1.0%
GitHub Advanced Security	5.8%
Other	93.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Sabna Sainudeen

Director, Application Security at Carlsberg

Seamlessly integrates into developer environment for streamlined code scanning

GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner. There are features in GitHub Advanced Security that cannot be used within Microsoft, which is strange since they are the same company. It should also focus on developing a software bill of materials (SBOM) to see all open software used in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's fantastic. We have checked a couple of other vendors and seen their results, which are quite inferior to the amount of detail that the GitGuardian Platform provides. With instantaneous notifications connected to our Slack platform, it allows us to deal quickly with incidents."

"It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smaller company and have never changed in size, but we got to the point where we felt the service brought us value, and we want to pay for it. We also wanted an SLA for technical support and whatnot, so we switched to a paid plan. Without that, they had a super-generous, free tier, and I was immensely impressed with it."

"GitGuardian Internal Monitoring has helped increase our secrets detection rate by several orders of magnitude. This is a hard metric to get. For example, if we knew what our secrets were and where they were, we wouldn't need GitGuardian or these types of solutions. There could be a million more secrets that GitGuardian doesn't detect, but it is basically impossible to find them by searching for them."

"It actually creates an incident ticket for us. We can now go end-to-end after a secret has been identified, to track down who owns the repository and who is responsible for cleaning it up."

"There is quite a lot to like. Its user interface is fantastic, and being able to sort the incidents by whether they are valid or for a certain repository or a certain user has been very beneficial in helping investigate what has been found."

"What I appreciate the most about GitGuardian Platform is its efficiency when triggering our pipeline and notifying us if secrets have been exposed, such as APIs, variables, our database, or anything being exposed."

"GitGuardian has pretty broad detection capabilities. It covers all of the types of secrets that we've been interested in... [Yet] The "detector" concept, which identifies particular categories or types of secrets, allows an organization to tweak and tailor the configuration for things that are specific to its environment. This is highly useful if you're particularly worried about a certain type of secret and it can help focus attention, as part of early remediation efforts."

"When they give you a description of what happened, it's really easy to follow and to retest. And the ability to retest is something that you don't have in other solutions. If a secret was detected, you can retest if it is still there. It will show you if it is in the history."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"GitHub Advanced Security's secret scanning is good."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"The main disadvantage I feel they should improve upon is that apart from flagging credential issues or secrets, they could incorporate something else to make it more dynamic."

"We'd like to request a new GitGuardian feature that automates user onboarding and access control for code repositories."

"We have encountered occasional difficulties with the Single Sign-On process."

"It would be nice if they supported detecting PII or had some kind of data loss prevention feature."

"The purchasing process is convoluted compared to Snyk, the other tool we use. It's like night and day because you only need to punch in your credit card, and you're set. With GitGuardian, getting a quote took two or three weeks. We paid for it in December but have not settled that payment yet."

"Other solutions have a live chat feature that provides instant results. Waiting for an agent to reply to an email is less ideal than an instant conversation with a support employee. That's a complaint so minor I almost hesitate to mention it."

"GitGuardian's hook and dashboard scanners are the two entities. They should work together as one. We've seen several discrepancies where the hook is not being flagged on the dashboard. I still think they need to do some fine-tuning around that. We don't want to waste time."

"There has been a little bit of downtime of late, and it has been reasonably impactful when it's not been scanning."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"Open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"It's not cheap, but it's not crazy expensive either."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

"You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."

"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."

"It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inli...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 12% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 42% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 15% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 1% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

December 2025

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

GitHub

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.