GitGuardian Platform vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

GitGuardian and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitGuardian is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.8, while GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9. GitGuardian holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

4,006 Views
2,003 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 11 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,599 Views
7,599 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 28, 2025

GitGuardian Platform and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the software security category. GitGuardian seems to have the upper hand due to its specialized focus on secret detection and low false positive rates.

Features: GitGuardian Platform offers internal monitoring, proactive alerts for secrets, and low false-positive rates. It helps developers by providing swift issue rectification. GitHub Advanced Security provides seamless integration within development workflows, security, and secret scanning capabilities, enhancing the standard development environment.

Room for Improvement: GitGuardian could improve customization for healthcare identifiers and expand integration and secret management for teams. GitHub Advanced Security can increase interoperability with more programming languages and enhance its reporting features, as well as support broader cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian offers multiple deployment options across on-premises, public, and private clouds with high user satisfaction in customer support. Its technical assistance is detailed and responsive. GitHub Advanced Security provides cloud-based simplicity with minimal technical support needed, marking an intuitive onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian's pricing is viewed as reasonable, with a robust return on investment. It offers value, especially for smaller teams using its free plan. GitHub Advanced Security, though effective, can be costly for larger teams but offers considerable ROI by preventing data breaches and minimizing risks.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (5th), Software Supply Chain Security (6th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (3rd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 7.6%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub Advanced Security	7.6%
GitGuardian Platform	0.9%
Other	91.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Sabna Sainudeen

Director, Application Security at Carlsberg

Seamlessly integrates into developer environment for streamlined code scanning

GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner. There are features in GitHub Advanced Security that cannot be used within Microsoft, which is strange since they are the same company. It should also focus on developing a software bill of materials (SBOM) to see all open software used in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement."

"It enables us to identify leaks that happened in the past and remediate current leaks as they happen in near real-time. When I say "near real-time," I mean within minutes. These are industry-leading remediation timelines for credential leaks. Previously, it might have taken companies years to get credentials detected or remediated. We can do it in minutes."

"I like GitGuardian's instant response. When you have an incident, it's reported immediately. The interface gives you a great overview of your current leaked secrets."

"When they give you a description of what happened, it's really easy to follow and to retest. And the ability to retest is something that you don't have in other solutions. If a secret was detected, you can retest if it is still there. It will show you if it is in the history."

"It actually creates an incident ticket for us. We can now go end-to-end after a secret has been identified, to track down who owns the repository and who is responsible for cleaning it up."

"The newest addition that we appreciate about GitGuardian Platform is the ability to create a custom detector, which we built and worked with the team, and that works very effectively."

"Presently, we find the pre-commit hooks more useful."

"GitGuardian has also helped us develop a security-minded culture. We're serious about shift left and getting better about code security. I think a lot of people are getting more mindful about what a secret is."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives."

"If a developer commits code into their repo, it generates an alert. The alert comes into Slack, but by the time someone looks at it through the Slack alerting channel, the developer might have gone and already fixed or closed the issue. There's no sort of feedback loop to come back into the notification channel to show that it's been addressed."

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring."

"The documentation could be improved because when we started working with GitGuardian, it was difficult to find specific use cases."

"It took us a while to get new patterns introduced into the pattern reporting process."

"An area for improvement is the front end for incidents. The user experience in this area could be much better."

"GitGuardian encompasses many secrets that companies might have, but we are a Microsoft-only organization, so there are some limitations there in terms of their honey tokens. I'd like for it to not be limited to Amazon-based tokens. It would be nice to see a broader set of providers that you could pick from."

"We have been somewhat confused by the dashboard at times."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. GitGuardian is one of the most recent security tools we've adopted. When it came time to renew it, there was no doubt about it. It is licensed per developer, so it scales nicely with the number of repos that we have. We can create new repositories and break up work. It isn't scaling based on the amount of data it's consuming."

"GitGuardian is on the pricier side."

"It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are very happy with the value we get."

"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

"We have seen a return on investment. The amount of time that we would have spent manually doing this definitely outpaces the cost of GitGuardian. It is saving us about $35,000 a year, so I would say the ROI is about $20,000 a year."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

19%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I use GitHub Advanced Security. I work with GitHub. I am an implementer of GitHub. For migrations, my clients and I typically use GitHub Advanced Security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 17% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 16% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 43% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 18% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 9% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 1% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

October 2025

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

October 2025

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

No data available

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security

September 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.