

Hyland OnBase and GeneXus are competing in the enterprise content management and development category. Hyland OnBase appears to have the upper hand in integration and configurability, while GeneXus scores higher on flexibility and rapid application development.
Features: Hyland OnBase is known for its document management capabilities, smooth workflow automation, and integration options. GeneXus is recognized for its powerful development environment, code generation, and flexibility in app building.
Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase needs better mobile support, intuitive content search functionality, and improved mobile integration. GeneXus requires enhanced debugging tools, more frequent updates, and better documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase users find the deployment process straightforward but occasionally delayed customer support. GeneXus users report a complex deployment process but responsive and helpful customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is priced high but delivers good ROI through enhanced efficiency. GeneXus has reasonable setup costs and offers better long-term ROI due to its versatile application development capabilities.
I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.
I have been able to see a return on investment as the time for approvals has been reduced, and since they are centralized, everything is in one place.
Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.
I would describe the customer service and technical support of Hyland OnBase as being based on the partner that is used.
I find technical support from Hyland to be good.
Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.
Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.
The experience with the platform's learning curve is quite steep, especially for less technical staff.
The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.
I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.
The main factors that influenced my decision to choose Hyland OnBase over other options available on the market were the cost compared to others and the high document-handling capacity that Hyland OnBase can provide.
We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.
It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.
The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.
The best features that Hyland OnBase offers are the security it provides to control permissions and the traceability of documents.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyland OnBase | 2.0% |
| GeneXus | 1.1% |
| Other | 96.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
GeneXus quickly implements and integrates technologies like AI, supports multiple languages, and enhances workflow and mobile development. It offers frequent updates for system compatibility and efficient front-end and back-end development.
GeneXus enables multi-language development including C#, Java, and JavaScript, optimizing database connections and supporting mobile applications. Frequent IDE updates ensure compatibility with new systems while its low-code environment enhances efficiency. Integration with tools like DevOps enhances version control, and it runs on servers like IIS, Azure, and Tomcat, saving time and reducing costs. Despite strengths, users seek improved documentation, enhanced front-end capabilities, modern components, and better integration. Expanded community resources, security features, performance, and faster code generation are highlighted areas for improvement along with increased awareness and support.
What are the key features of GeneXus?GeneXus is utilized for web development and applications across web and mobile platforms. It integrates enterprise systems and generates code in C Sharp, CSS, and JavaScript. Companies apply its frameworks for project management within industries such as insurance, banking, social, and medical sectors, predominantly in South America.
Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.