Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is GeneXus?

Featured GeneXus reviews

GeneXus mindshare

Product category:
As of September 2025, the mindshare of GeneXus in the Mobile Development Platforms category stands at 3.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GeneXus3.6%
OutSystems17.5%
Mendix16.7%
Other62.2%
Mobile Development Platforms

PeerResearch reports based on GeneXus reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryMobile Development PlatformsSep 13, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonGeneXus vs OutSystemsSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonGeneXus vs Salesforce PlatformSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonGeneXus vs MendixSep 13, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Power Apps3.9N/A93%95 interviewsAdd to research
Oracle Application Express (APEX)4.1N/A90%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise42
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
Performing Arts
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Media Company
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Government
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Non Profit
3%
Logistics Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
University
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
 
GeneXus Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA4.5In our company, we use GeneXus for developing enterprise systems, benefiting from its integration capabilities and simple architecture. While code generation can be time-consuming, it offers a good ROI by supporting development across multiple applications and user scales.
GeneXus Senior Analyst - Team Lead at Fifasoft Middle East4.5I use GeneXus, a low-code platform, to create web applications for my company, with on-premises deployment. The front-end features are valuable, it's beginner-friendly, and development is faster compared to OutSystems, Mendix, and Ionic.
D&A and Genexus Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used GeneXus across various versions, and it's effective for modeling workflows and transactions, though documentation and design tools need improvement. It's a worthwhile investment for large companies but less ideal for smaller ones.
Developer Senior Genexus 16 Analyst at Migrate Brasil5.0No summary available
Sr. Software Architect at GxSoft4.5In the early 1990s, I transitioned from personal computers to IBM's AS/400 for COBOL and RPG. GeneXus effectively reorganizes databases and generates cross-language applications but needs a modernized interface. ROI varies based on application type and cost.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0I use GeneXus for a project with a big insurance company in Mexico. It's great for testing and integrates well with DevOps. However, it can be resource-heavy and its security needs improvement, so I add extra security externally.
Operations Manager at FifaSoft4.5We use GeneXus for developing web and mobile applications across various systems. Its most valuable feature is the integration module, enabling system creation from outdated databases. However, more extensions and user controls for the front-end would enhance usability.
Genexus Senior Analyst at Fifasoft Middle East3.5I used GeneXus for various projects due to its compatibility and focus on business cases rather than technical details. While it's cost-effective compared to OutSystems, it could benefit from a wiki and better community support for developers.