GeneXus quickly implements and integrates technologies like AI, supports multiple languages, and enhances workflow and mobile development. It offers frequent updates for system compatibility and efficient front-end and back-end development.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| GeneXus | 3.5% |
| OutSystems | 9.7% |
| Temenos Quantum | 8.9% |
| Other | 77.9% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Apps | 3.9 | N/A | 93% | 96 interviewsAdd to research |
| Mendix | 4.1 | 7.9% | 95% | 63 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
GeneXus enables multi-language development including C#, Java, and JavaScript, optimizing database connections and supporting mobile applications. Frequent IDE updates ensure compatibility with new systems while its low-code environment enhances efficiency. Integration with tools like DevOps enhances version control, and it runs on servers like IIS, Azure, and Tomcat, saving time and reducing costs. Despite strengths, users seek improved documentation, enhanced front-end capabilities, modern components, and better integration. Expanded community resources, security features, performance, and faster code generation are highlighted areas for improvement along with increased awareness and support.
What are the key features of GeneXus?GeneXus is utilized for web development and applications across web and mobile platforms. It integrates enterprise systems and generates code in C Sharp, CSS, and JavaScript. Companies apply its frameworks for project management within industries such as insurance, banking, social, and medical sectors, predominantly in South America.
Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA | 4.5 | In our company, we use GeneXus for developing enterprise systems, benefiting from its integration capabilities and simple architecture. While code generation can be time-consuming, it offers a good ROI by supporting development across multiple applications and user scales. |
| GeneXus Senior Analyst - Team Lead at Fifasoft Middle East | 4.5 | I use GeneXus, a low-code platform, to create web applications for my company, with on-premises deployment. The front-end features are valuable, it's beginner-friendly, and development is faster compared to OutSystems, Mendix, and Ionic. |
| Developer Senior Genexus 16 Analyst at Migrate Brasil | 5.0 | As a daily GeneXus user for three years, I find this solution excellent (10/10). It improved my work planning and is scalable, though expensive. I'd like improvements in APA and API web receiver calls. |
| Sr. Software Architect at GxSoft | 4.5 | In the early 1990s, I transitioned from personal computers to IBM's AS/400 for COBOL and RPG. GeneXus effectively reorganizes databases and generates cross-language applications but needs a modernized interface. ROI varies based on application type and cost. |
| D&A and Genexus Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used GeneXus across various versions, and it's effective for modeling workflows and transactions, though documentation and design tools need improvement. It's a worthwhile investment for large companies but less ideal for smaller ones. |
| Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I use GeneXus for a project with a big insurance company in Mexico. It's great for testing and integrates well with DevOps. However, it can be resource-heavy and its security needs improvement, so I add extra security externally. |
| Operations Manager at FifaSoft | 4.5 | We use GeneXus for developing web and mobile applications across various systems. Its most valuable feature is the integration module, enabling system creation from outdated databases. However, more extensions and user controls for the front-end would enhance usability. |
| Genexus Senior Analyst at Fifasoft Middle East | 3.5 | I used GeneXus for various projects due to its compatibility and focus on business cases rather than technical details. While it's cost-effective compared to OutSystems, it could benefit from a wiki and better community support for developers. |