What is GeneXus? GeneXus™ is the best Low-Code Platform that you don't know yet.
It's a Software Development Platform that simplifies and automates the tasks of creating and evolving enterprise applications and multi-channel user-experiences. Great Advantages:
- Higher productivity, with automatic maintenance & evolution
- Multi-Experience, we continuously create new code generators
- Agile, incremental approach, with fully functional prototypes
- Easier to learn, one single language to cover all technologies
- Future-proof, we've been around for 30 years, evolving for you
Key Differentiators against the competition:
- No runtime fees, we charge by developer
- Best theoretical framework, which allows us to evolve
- Best coverage in the market: Most technologies, most languages, most markets and industries
- We run on-premise or on the cloud
- Multiple starting points depending on the type of company you work in, with products for Students, Startups, ISVs, Corporate Development, and SAP technologies
GeneXus uses Artificial Intelligence techniques to create software, enabling truly incremental development of apps, providing a low-code, future-proof development platform for the leading execution platforms and languages, and the most popular DBMS.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
GeneXus | 3.6% |
OutSystems | 17.5% |
Mendix | 16.7% |
Other | 62.2% |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Power Apps | 3.9 | N/A | 93% | 95 interviewsAdd to research |
Oracle Application Express (APEX) | 4.1 | N/A | 90% | 60 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 2 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 31 |
Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
Large Enterprise | 42 |
Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA | 4.5 | In our company, we use GeneXus for developing enterprise systems, benefiting from its integration capabilities and simple architecture. While code generation can be time-consuming, it offers a good ROI by supporting development across multiple applications and user scales. |
GeneXus Senior Analyst - Team Lead at Fifasoft Middle East | 4.5 | I use GeneXus, a low-code platform, to create web applications for my company, with on-premises deployment. The front-end features are valuable, it's beginner-friendly, and development is faster compared to OutSystems, Mendix, and Ionic. |
D&A and Genexus Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used GeneXus across various versions, and it's effective for modeling workflows and transactions, though documentation and design tools need improvement. It's a worthwhile investment for large companies but less ideal for smaller ones. |
Developer Senior Genexus 16 Analyst at Migrate Brasil | 5.0 | No summary available |
Sr. Software Architect at GxSoft | 4.5 | In the early 1990s, I transitioned from personal computers to IBM's AS/400 for COBOL and RPG. GeneXus effectively reorganizes databases and generates cross-language applications but needs a modernized interface. ROI varies based on application type and cost. |
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I use GeneXus for a project with a big insurance company in Mexico. It's great for testing and integrates well with DevOps. However, it can be resource-heavy and its security needs improvement, so I add extra security externally. |
Operations Manager at FifaSoft | 4.5 | We use GeneXus for developing web and mobile applications across various systems. Its most valuable feature is the integration module, enabling system creation from outdated databases. However, more extensions and user controls for the front-end would enhance usability. |
Genexus Senior Analyst at Fifasoft Middle East | 3.5 | I used GeneXus for various projects due to its compatibility and focus on business cases rather than technical details. While it's cost-effective compared to OutSystems, it could benefit from a wiki and better community support for developers. |