

Symantec Proxy and Forcepoint ONE compete in the security domain, particularly in web security and data protection. Forcepoint ONE appears to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, offering greater overall value.
Features: Symantec Proxy offers granular web traffic control, advanced threat protection, and a reliable Global Intelligence Network. Forcepoint ONE provides integrated cloud security, Zero Trust Network Access, and robust remote user protection.
Room for Improvement: Symantec Proxy could enhance its deployment complexity, improve cloud features, and refine user interface intuitiveness. Forcepoint ONE might strengthen its data at rest capabilities, better integrate third-party solutions, and simplify user management features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint ONE is noted for a streamlined deployment process and proactive customer support, ideal for quick setup. Symantec Proxy requires a more complex deployment, potentially increasing resource use and time.
Pricing and ROI: Symantec Proxy offers affordable setup with solid ROI primarily due to effective web security solutions. Forcepoint ONE, despite a higher initial investment, provides extensive features leading to potentially greater long-term ROI.
I have fewer employees because Forcepoint ONE does the work that I used to rely on a team of engineers to previously detect.
Since I'm on the technical side, I don't handle ROI or financial metrics directly, but based on client feedback, many have seen improvements in operational efficiency mainly through centralized policy management and reduced manual investigation time, resulting in time savings and better visibility across their environments.
It is very difficult to measure the return on investment, but the control for the data is very important for companies because without an application similar to Forcepoint ONE, there is no control.
For supercritical businesses, there should be a return on investment due to the enhanced security features and resilience.
Having a local principal support available also helps speed up communication and coordination, especially for urgent or region-specific cases.
An engineer comes to resolve the issue.
They are responsive and assist me with creating cases for any complex issues.
Support services are lagging and not very responsive.
It can easily scale to support thousands of users and devices without requiring major infrastructure changes.
Forcepoint ONE runs smoothly, and scaling is easy.
Forcepoint ONE is very scalable because it is located in the cloud, and I don't have to manage the machines or anything with the infrastructure.
Forcepoint ONE is very stable.
There have been some specific outcomes since switching to Forcepoint ONE.
I think Forcepoint ONE is pretty stable, as the connection and agent synchronization are reliable, but it can still be improved.
Stability depends on the platform on which it is deployed and the number of users.
I need to control specific functionalities within certain applications, like preventing the transfer of certain file types.
Having more flexible reporting and alert customization to tailor insights for different clients and compliance needs would be beneficial.
There is room for improvement in making the reporting closer to real-time, ideally around five or ten minutes instead of half an hour.
The product needs improvement in support services, as they are lagging and not very responsive when we raise concerns or queries, especially in terms of significant impact.
AI features could potentially improve the proxy by helping build rules more efficiently, suggesting unused rules, and enhancing preference setting.
The pricing is very good and cheaper than other solutions like Netskope and Forcepoint.
the pricing is better than all
The licensing and pricing were fine with no issues.
Pricing is difficult to specify as Broadcom sells platforms that include multiple products, making it hard to determine the exact cost for the proxy component.
The most valuable feature was the website blocking capability, which allowed me to quickly block any dodgy websites.
It shortens response time for our clients, allowing their security team to view incidents in real-time, classify them easily, and focus on genuine risks instead of sorting through false positives, and it simplifies reporting and audit preparation since all the relevant data is consolidated in one place.
Forcepoint ONE made a difference, particularly regarding cost reduction because all the features that Forcepoint ONE bundles are in one package.
The most valuable features are content inspection, caching, SSL encryption, decryption, WAN optimization, and more.
The integration with FireGlass has been essential since both solutions are from Broadcom, enhancing compatibility.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint ONE | 1.7% |
| Symantec Proxy | 1.7% |
| Other | 96.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Forcepoint ONE offers a comprehensive solution for data protection and security compliance, focusing on cloud applications and role-based access control for safe interactions across platforms.
Forcepoint ONE effectively manages data access, ensuring security and compliance while reducing operational costs and offering a user-friendly interface for easy management. Integrating seamlessly with existing company devices, it provides enhanced Zero Trust Network Access, incident management, and identity verification. Cloud application protection, including Office 365, is maximized through strategic use of Secure Web Gateway (SWG) and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) models, which help guard against unauthorized access, manage secure logins, and filter URL content.
What are the key features of Forcepoint ONE?Organizations use Forcepoint ONE primarily for ensuring compliance and secure data management in environments like healthcare and corporate sectors. By safeguarding sensitive information like PHI and utilizing robust role-based access control, users can enhance security measures significantly. Additionally, the system's ability to manage secure exchanges and protect resources underlines its relevance in regulated industries.
Symantec Proxy offers robust web security by providing features like content caching and URL filtering. It enhances security, optimizes performance, and simplifies policy management for enterprises, serving as a dynamic tool across cloud environments.
Symantec Proxy integrates with Broadcom's FireGlass, providing enhanced compatibility and seamless functionality. Known for a stable deployment and a precise URL database, it offers comprehensive threat detection and policy creation, utilizing the Global Intelligence Network. Users deploy it for web security, malware blocking, and traffic filtering. Symantec Proxy's reputation and site categorization bolster defense against malicious sites, although SSL inspection, dashboard integration, and technical support could benefit from improvements. The platform has shifted post-Broadcom acquisition, needing streamlined solutions. Current challenges include performance with O365 and complexities around pricing and licensing.
What features define Symantec Proxy?Enterprises leverage Symantec Proxy to secure web access and manage Internet usage across industries. Deployed across cloud providers like AWS, GCP, and Azure, it supports URL filtering, remote access, and bandwidth control by user privileges. Organizations also find value in its role within antivirus scanning, policy customization, and reporting.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.