F5 BIG-IQ vs Make comparison

Read 18 Make reviews

3,642 Views
2,258 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

F5 BIG-IQ and Make are competing products in network management and automation. Make is perceived to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and deployment model, which justifies its pricing for some buyers.

Features: F5 BIG-IQ offers advanced traffic management, robust network security features, and centralized management, appealing to organizations with specific network priorities. Make provides extensive automation features, a broad array of integrations, and a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, benefiting environments that value flexibility and integration.

Room for Improvement: F5 BIG-IQ could enhance its visibility and dashboard features and improve flexibility in rules configuration. Its logging and monitoring system require more reliability. Make could expand its documentation for advanced features, offer more advanced AI capabilities, and improve the initial setup for more complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IQ has a structured deployment model with extensive documentation and strong customer support aiding the setup. Make offers a more intuitive and user-friendly deployment model, allowing IT teams to manage the setup independently with less need for direct support intervention.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IQ involves significant setup costs but provides a substantial ROI for organizations needing comprehensive network management. Make, with moderate pricing, provides a strong ROI due to its automation efficiencies and scalability, making it appealing for businesses optimizing operational workflows and costs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make Report (Updated: June 2026).

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IQ

Ranking in Process Automation

26th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Make	1.7%
F5 BIG-IQ	0.9%
Other	97.4%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Bikale Kassu

Manager for Implementation and Administration at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has faced challenges with visibility and technical support but allows centralized management of multiple sites

The configuration part is complex for F5 BIG-IQ. The simplicity and visibility part needs improvement. The dashboard, especially the analytics part, needs to be more simple and presentable. For the security part, it is difficult to present to our management, so we have to capture it and prepare manual reporting options rather than getting them directly from the system. The automation part in F5 BIG-IQ is limited; we are still using it only for load balancing for some services. We haven't integrated it with our Accesso or implemented any automation options. The setup process for F5 BIG-IQ would rate a five out of ten.

Read full review

Dinesh Lavu

Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects

Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is quite good in a large environment where I have multiple devices; it is easy to manage the devices."

"There is a lot less risk involved in having applications available on the Internet."

"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."

"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."

"The most valuable features are load balancing and WAF."

"This solution is one of the finest in the industry."

"Their technical support is perfect, they were so supportive, the guys are great and they would do anything for you."

"We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."

More F5 BIG-IQ pros

"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."

"Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make."

"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."

"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing the number of hours that go into validating and verifying the flow of a particular repetitive process, which would otherwise take multiple hours, to just a few minutes to review for more than 1,000 or 2,000 case scenarios."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn."

"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."

More Make pros

Cons

"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."

"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."

"The solution's rSeries has been made free, and iSeries should be made free as well."

"A bug caused me to lose all the configuration."

"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."

"Sometimes the solution does not work."

"If they had a GUI interface for creating security rules then it would make it easier."

"For stability, F5 BIG-IQ rates a two or three because currently we are integrating it with our third party as a port forwarding service. We created many VIPs, but on average, weekly, we lose three to five connections, making the troubleshooting part a headache for us."

More F5 BIG-IQ cons

"Actually, I did not finish this project with Make; I could not manage to finish the full workflow, and I decided to leave it as it is, implementing it a different way because it is very tricky."

"I give Make a rating of seven because it is not open-sourced and there are many hidden charges, which can affect a beginner's workflow when trying it out."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier."

"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."

"There is a file size constraint, as when I try to upload a PDF question bank of 200 pages, it shows an error and the file cannot process the data."

"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."

"Make can enhance the credit limit for free use because what is happening now is that most of the credits have been used during testing only."

More Make cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."

"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."

"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IQ?

From the pricing perspective, F5 BIG-IQ rates an eight out of ten as it's reasonably priced.

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?

What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IQ?

Currently for WAF, we are moving to another device, F5. We are not using Imperva. F5 BIG-IQ is the Web Application Firewall we're currently using, but regarding the Imperva products, now we are flo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...

What needs improvement with Make?

I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...

What is your primary use case for Make?

My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.

ServiceNow Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 24% of the time

Compared 21% of the time

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 12% of the time

Camunda vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 10% of the time

Control-M vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 8% of the time

More F5 BIG-IQ Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 14% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Zapier vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

F5 BIG-IQ

Download F5 BIG-IQ product report

Download Make product report

Also Known As

No data available

Integromat

Overview

F5 BIG-IQ simplifies the centralized management of BIG-IP appliances, providing load balancing and application firewall services. It ensures efficient large-scale operations and is user-friendly, enhancing seamless configuration migrations.

F5 BIG-IQ is designed for organizations seeking to manage multiple F5 appliances through a single interface, offering solutions for load balancing, web application security, and policy migration. Suitable for on-premises or cloud deployments, it caters to service providers and data centers. While some users suggest improvements in GUI usability and performance optimization, F5 BIG-IQ effectively supports web and email security, internet banking, and SSL operations. The GUI is appreciated for ease of use by network-savvy engineers, though dashboard functionality could be enhanced.

What are the standout features of F5 BIG-IQ?

Load Balancing: Manages traffic distribution efficiently across multiple servers.
Centralized Management: Streamlines control of F5 appliance settings from a single location.
Application Firewall: Offers robust protection for web applications against threats.
Seamless Configuration Migration: Allows easy transfer of configurations between devices.
Scalability: Supports operations on a large scale without compromising performance.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating F5 BIG-IQ?

User-Friendliness: Intuitive design for network experts, reducing the learning curve.
Error Reduction: Minimizes errors in policy management, leading to smoother operations.
Efficient Integration: Integrates with existing infrastructure, enhancing workflow continuity.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides value by optimizing resource allocation and management.

F5 BIG-IQ is implemented across service providers, data centers, and diverse industries for robust load balancing and application security. It handles internet-facing web application security, supports SQL policy management, and enables efficient collaboration with F5 teams. Numerous organizations apply it for internet banking security, email protection, and spearhead SSL transactions, benefiting from its capacity to adapt to rapidly changing requirements.

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Buan Consulting, Armadia

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make