F5 BIG-IQ vs Make comparison

F5 and Make are both solutions in the Process Automation category. F5 is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.5, while Make is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0. F5 holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to Make’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Make users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IQ

Read 15 F5 BIG-IQ reviews

564 Views
564 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

643 Views
495 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IQ

Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

F5 BIG-IQ and Make compete in the networking and automation sectors. Make has the upper hand with advanced features suited for users prioritizing capabilities, while F5 BIG-IQ shines in pricing and support.

Features: F5 BIG-IQ offers centralized software management, streamlined configurations, and enhanced visibility of network applications. Make provides intricate workflow automation, integrations across various platforms, and extensive automation capabilities appealing to users requiring a broader feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IQ focuses on ease of deployment with centralized management, reducing complexity in large-scale networks. It includes supportive customer service for seamless operation. Make offers an intuitive setup for quick adoption, with highly rated customer service, agile and responsive.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IQ offers competitive pricing and substantial ROI, particularly for large enterprises needing network management solutions. Its scalable pricing supports long-term value. Make's higher initial costs deliver significant ROI due to deep automation features, saving time and resources, making its feature-rich experience worth the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IQ

Ranking in Process Automation

29th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Make	1.1%
F5 BIG-IQ	0.8%
Other	98.1%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Bikale Kassu

Manager for Implementation and Administration at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has faced challenges with visibility and technical support but allows centralized management of multiple sites

The configuration part is complex for F5 BIG-IQ. The simplicity and visibility part needs improvement. The dashboard, especially the analytics part, needs to be more simple and presentable. For the security part, it is difficult to present to our management, so we have to capture it and prepare manual reporting options rather than getting them directly from the system. The automation part in F5 BIG-IQ is limited; we are still using it only for load balancing for some services. We haven't integrated it with our Accesso or implemented any automation options. The setup process for F5 BIG-IQ would rate a five out of ten.

Read full review

Farhan Ahmed Sheikh

Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions

Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes

Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best aspect of the solution is that we can have everything integrated with a rather large capacity in order to personalize and configure specific rules."

"Features like AFM, the gateway, and Global DNS are the coolest features that save work for us."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP."

"The customer service is great."

"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."

"We mainly use F5 BIG-IQ to protect our web-based applications, such as our email and website, so we use it as a web-based application firewall for those services."

"The reporting feature is quite good."

"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."

More F5 BIG-IQ pros

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"Make has a very good return on investment because although we pay that amount, we secure clients and the client life cycle is kept intact."

Cons

"A bug caused me to lose all the configuration."

"For stability, F5 BIG-IQ rates a two or three because currently we are integrating it with our third party as a port forwarding service. We created many VIPs, but on average, weekly, we lose three to five connections, making the troubleshooting part a headache for us."

"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."

"The shell, kernel, or Linux has something like a delay, especially with the Virtual Edition, when you are trying to implement it in the cloud and you want to access it remotely with web management. It would be great if they could improve their kernel. It was difficult for me, especially when I got started with BIG-IP. I was struggling to find which commands work with it. If you want to work with it, you have to be a Linux guy."

"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."

"From a hands-on experience perspective, more resources should be available on the Internet, like labs and lab preparations."

"The solution's rSeries has been made free, and iSeries should be made free as well."

"There are a lot of scripts available on the internet for people who know how to use them, but with a graphical interface, it would be easier for new users."

More F5 BIG-IQ cons

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"One thing is that the platform is really slow when loading. It takes about three minutes to get to the page of an automation and start changing things."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."

"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."

"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IQ?

F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IQ?

From the pricing perspective, F5 BIG-IQ rates an eight out of ten as it's reasonably priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

One thing is that the platform is really slow when loading. It takes about three minutes to get to the page of an automation and start changing things. That is really slow and frustrating. Another ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

In our current company, we have a funnel workflow for the people who sign up. We do certain things such as creating database entries, creating our CRM entries, and then updating the information. If...

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 59% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 41% of the time

More F5 BIG-IQ Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 28% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 17% of the time

Temporal vs Make

Compared 16% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 14% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 14% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ

January 2026

Download F5 BIG-IQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

December 2025

Download Make product report

Also Known As

No data available

Integromat

Overview

F5® BIG-IQ® Centralized Management provides a unified point of visibility and control for the entire F5 portfolio, ensuring administrators remain aware on the pulse of F5 devices, modules, and licenses and enabling them to deliver optimal application availability, performance, and security.

BIG-IQ manages policies,licenses, SSL certificates, BIG-IP images, and configurations for F5 appliances and for the following BIG-IP moduals across hardware and virtual editions:

BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager™ (LTM)
F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall™ (WAF)
BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager™ (AFM)
F5 SSL Orchestrator®
F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender®
BIG-IP Access Policy Manager® (APM)
F5 Secure Web Gateway Services
BIG-IP DNS

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Make

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make

December 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.