F5 BIG-IQ vs Make comparison

Read 18 Make reviews

4,825 Views
2,654 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

F5 BIG-IQ and Make are competing products in network management and automation. Make is perceived to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and deployment model, which justifies its pricing for some buyers.

Features: F5 BIG-IQ offers advanced traffic management, robust network security features, and centralized management, appealing to organizations with specific network priorities. Make provides extensive automation features, a broad array of integrations, and a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, benefiting environments that value flexibility and integration.

Room for Improvement: F5 BIG-IQ could enhance its visibility and dashboard features and improve flexibility in rules configuration. Its logging and monitoring system require more reliability. Make could expand its documentation for advanced features, offer more advanced AI capabilities, and improve the initial setup for more complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IQ has a structured deployment model with extensive documentation and strong customer support aiding the setup. Make offers a more intuitive and user-friendly deployment model, allowing IT teams to manage the setup independently with less need for direct support intervention.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IQ involves significant setup costs but provides a substantial ROI for organizations needing comprehensive network management. Make, with moderate pricing, provides a strong ROI due to its automation efficiencies and scalability, making it appealing for businesses optimizing operational workflows and costs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make Report (Updated: September 2026).

Download the complete report

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Make

September 2026

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IQ

Ranking in Process Automation

26th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Make	1.6%
F5 BIG-IQ	1.0%
Other	97.4%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Bikale Kassu

Manager for Implementation and Administration at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has faced challenges with visibility and technical support but allows centralized management of multiple sites

The configuration part is complex for F5 BIG-IQ. The simplicity and visibility part needs improvement. The dashboard, especially the analytics part, needs to be more simple and presentable. For the security part, it is difficult to present to our management, so we have to capture it and prepare manual reporting options rather than getting them directly from the system. The automation part in F5 BIG-IQ is limited; we are still using it only for load balancing for some services. We haven't integrated it with our Accesso or implemented any automation options. The setup process for F5 BIG-IQ would rate a five out of ten.

Read full review

Dinesh Lavu

Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects

Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is one of the finest in the industry."

"Overall, this is a good solution and I would recommend it but they need better integration with VAS."

"We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."

"The GUI is fine, at least from an engineer's perspective."

"The F5 solution scales very easily, and if we have more boxes then we can just join them to the cluster."

"Features like AFM, the gateway, and Global DNS are the coolest features that save work for us."

"Their technical support is perfect, they were so supportive, the guys are great and they would do anything for you."

"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."

More F5 BIG-IQ pros

"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."

"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."

"I am using Make for content creation, and it saves time in content creation for me and helps with tasks by creating content for me even without writing a single word."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing our manual workflow and workload by almost twenty to thirty percent, which I feel is great."

"Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make."

More Make pros

Cons

"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."

"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"If they had a GUI interface for creating security rules then it would make it easier."

"You do need to have a good and solid background or foundation for networking and you need to understand how to configure F5 appliances in order to properly use it."

"For us, right now, F5 is too expensive."

"From a hands-on experience perspective, more resources should be available on the Internet, like labs and lab preparations."

"The shell, kernel, or Linux has something like a delay, especially with the Virtual Edition, when you are trying to implement it in the cloud and you want to access it remotely with web management. It would be great if they could improve their kernel. It was difficult for me, especially when I got started with BIG-IP. I was struggling to find which commands work with it. If you want to work with it, you have to be a Linux guy."

More F5 BIG-IQ cons

"Make has helped me save time positively, but I think there is room for improvement in Make as well."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"One area for improvement is an auto-building feature."

"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"One area that needs improvement is the debugging and monitoring."

"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."

"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."

More Make cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."

"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IQ?

From the pricing perspective, F5 BIG-IQ rates an eight out of ten as it's reasonably priced.

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?

What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IQ?

Currently for WAF, we are moving to another device, F5. We are not using Imperva. F5 BIG-IQ is the Web Application Firewall we're currently using, but regarding the Imperva products, now we are flo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...

What needs improvement with Make?

I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...

What is your primary use case for Make?

My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.

ServiceNow Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 20% of the time

Compared 18% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Camunda vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Control-M vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 7% of the time

More F5 BIG-IQ Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Zapier vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 9% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Download F5 BIG-IQ product report

F5 BIG-IQ

October 2026

Download Make product report

September 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Integromat

Overview

F5 BIG-IQ simplifies the centralized management of BIG-IP appliances, providing load balancing and application firewall services. It ensures efficient large-scale operations and is user-friendly, enhancing seamless configuration migrations.

F5 BIG-IQ is designed for organizations seeking to manage multiple F5 appliances through a single interface, offering solutions for load balancing, web application security, and policy migration. Suitable for on-premises or cloud deployments, it caters to service providers and data centers. While some users suggest improvements in GUI usability and performance optimization, F5 BIG-IQ effectively supports web and email security, internet banking, and SSL operations. The GUI is appreciated for ease of use by network-savvy engineers, though dashboard functionality could be enhanced.

What are the standout features of F5 BIG-IQ?

Load Balancing: Manages traffic distribution efficiently across multiple servers.
Centralized Management: Streamlines control of F5 appliance settings from a single location.
Application Firewall: Offers robust protection for web applications against threats.
Seamless Configuration Migration: Allows easy transfer of configurations between devices.
Scalability: Supports operations on a large scale without compromising performance.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating F5 BIG-IQ?

User-Friendliness: Intuitive design for network experts, reducing the learning curve.
Error Reduction: Minimizes errors in policy management, leading to smoother operations.
Efficient Integration: Integrates with existing infrastructure, enhancing workflow continuity.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides value by optimizing resource allocation and management.

F5 BIG-IQ is implemented across service providers, data centers, and diverse industries for robust load balancing and application security. It handles internet-facing web application security, supports SQL policy management, and enables efficient collaboration with F5 teams. Numerous organizations apply it for internet banking security, email protection, and spearhead SSL transactions, benefiting from its capacity to adapt to rapidly changing requirements.

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Buan Consulting, Armadia