Make vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Make and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Make is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nintex is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Make holds a 0.9% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Make users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

375 Views
368 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,521 Views
1,311 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Make

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Make are competing products in the workflow automation space. Nintex typically has the upper hand with larger enterprises valuing its robust tools, while Make appeals to small and medium businesses with its ease of integration and versatility.

Features: Nintex Process Platform is known for powerful automation capabilities, advanced document generation, and seamless collaboration features. Make offers flexible integration options, a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, and versatility. Nintex is strong in enterprise environments, whereas Make provides flexibility and ease of use for IT teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex's deployment model is robust but requires more time and setup. Its customer service covers a wide range of issues comprehensively. Make is noted for quick deployment and effective customer support. While Nintex offers superior tactical support, Make's simplicity is a significant advantage for quicker implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform has higher setup costs, impacting ROI for smaller organizations but justified for larger ones due to its extensive features. Make offers more affordable pricing and quicker ROI, making it attractive for cost-effective automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (12th), Workload Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"Make saves a lot of time, and I have created really complex scenarios in Make."

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

"It can scale well."

"The setup is easy."

"K2 is reasonably priced."

"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."

"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."

"I think the initial setup is fine."

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make can be a bit difficult to use for new users, but for someone with technical knowledge and some coding skills, it becomes manageable, especially with Make's great UI features that really help."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."

"The tool can be limiting when more complex solutions are required. Improving it to offer greater functionality and less reliance on technical expertise could be beneficial."

"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."

"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be cl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

Some of the very simple use cases that people use Make for is AI-powered content creation. That is where we help them out with different kinds of content creation and social media posting, differen...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Make

Compared 47% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 25% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 16% of the time

Temporal vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

More Make Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

July 2025

Download Make product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

August 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

Integromat

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Make vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.