Make vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Make and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Make is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nintex is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Make holds a 0.9% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Make users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

327 Views
48 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

1,525 Views
241 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Make

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Make are competing products in the workflow automation space. Nintex typically has the upper hand with larger enterprises valuing its robust tools, while Make appeals to small and medium businesses with its ease of integration and versatility.

Features: Nintex Process Platform is known for powerful automation capabilities, advanced document generation, and seamless collaboration features. Make offers flexible integration options, a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, and versatility. Nintex is strong in enterprise environments, whereas Make provides flexibility and ease of use for IT teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex's deployment model is robust but requires more time and setup. Its customer service covers a wide range of issues comprehensively. Make is noted for quick deployment and effective customer support. While Nintex offers superior tactical support, Make's simplicity is a significant advantage for quicker implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform has higher setup costs, impacting ROI for smaller organizations but justified for larger ones due to its extensive features. Make offers more affordable pricing and quicker ROI, making it attractive for cost-effective automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Workload Automation (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Vitor Medeiros

National Sales Director at Konica Minolta

Offers capacity to integrate with external platforms but technically difficult

There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms. When we need to develop the forms, we don't have much customization, and I think we need more flexibility there. It's technically difficult, but it would be great to be able to develop our own code and integrate it into the platform. We could then run our own code for specific actions and requests or even develop a page or form. So, if I can ask Nintex for something, it would be a way to integrate our own code for specific actions. When it comes to integration, it could have more options for custom requests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"Make saves a lot of time, and I have created really complex scenarios in Make."

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."

"The integration capabilities have been very useful."

"The technical support provided by Nintex is very helpful."

"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."

"K2 is reasonably priced."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."

"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make can be a bit difficult to use for new users, but for someone with technical knowledge and some coding skills, it becomes manageable, especially with Make's great UI features that really help."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"It's very tedious to manage."

"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."

"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

I don't think there's anything else Make needs, but one improvement could be the addition of no-code steps that can be used within Make, similar to what Zapier offers with its own actions.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

As an entrepreneur and a freelancer who also runs my own agency, I use Make to set up automations for my clients. Recently, the most use cases are of AI agent or AI calling agent, but when I starte...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Make

Compared 57% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 30% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

More Make Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 19% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

Download Make product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

Integromat

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Make vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.