Make vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Make and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Make is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Make holds a 1.0% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Make users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

414 Views
406 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,379 Views
1,237 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Make

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Make are competing products in the workflow automation space. Nintex typically has the upper hand with larger enterprises valuing its robust tools, while Make appeals to small and medium businesses with its ease of integration and versatility.

Features: Nintex Process Platform is known for powerful automation capabilities, advanced document generation, and seamless collaboration features. Make offers flexible integration options, a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, and versatility. Nintex is strong in enterprise environments, whereas Make provides flexibility and ease of use for IT teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex's deployment model is robust but requires more time and setup. Its customer service covers a wide range of issues comprehensively. Make is noted for quick deployment and effective customer support. While Nintex offers superior tactical support, Make's simplicity is a significant advantage for quicker implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform has higher setup costs, impacting ROI for smaller organizations but justified for larger ones due to its extensive features. Make offers more affordable pricing and quicker ROI, making it attractive for cost-effective automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (12th), Workload Automation (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.9%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.9%
Make	1.0%
Other	97.1%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability

Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution. And in that case, you are looking for some custom development. And it's a little bit difficult in the Nintex area. Because they are totally dependent on the low-code solution, and you are looking at where you can implement your custom things. However, you can do that thing, but that will be a difficult task. Also, the outcome, whatever you are trying to get from such kind of custom development, will be a little bit difficult. Let's suppose, like, if you are working with a medium level of data or a small level of data that will be easier to handle with the Nintex. However, the bulk data on a high level of data would be difficult. I have been working with Nintex for the past three years. I've been able to create some really good products in different domains, including banking and insurance. Everything seems achievable, but there are a few things I'm missing. First, debugging can be a bit difficult in Nintex. You can't debug forms and workflows easily. This is something that could be improved in future releases. It requires some R&D. Second, I would like to see more integration with AI. There is some custom integration available through the gateway, but it would be great to have more AI-related features built into the platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"Make saves a lot of time, and I have created really complex scenarios in Make."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."

"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."

"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."

"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."

"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"Make can be a bit difficult to use for new users, but for someone with technical knowledge and some coding skills, it becomes manageable, especially with Make's great UI features that really help."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be cl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

Some of the very simple use cases that people use Make for is AI-powered content creation. That is where we help them out with different kinds of content creation and social media posting, differen...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Make

Compared 41% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 18% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 17% of the time

Temporal vs Make

Compared 15% of the time

More Make Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

August 2025

Download Make product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

Integromat

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Free Report: Make vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Make vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.