ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Kentik comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Kentik are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #74, while Kentik is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kentik’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kentik users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

1,504 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kentik

Read 16 Kentik reviews

2,300 Views
1,909 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Kentik

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations and Kentik are competing products in the network traffic analysis and monitoring space. Kentik holds a competitive edge regarding features due to its comprehensive suite, while ExtraHop stands out in customer support and pricing.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides advanced threat detection, real-time analytics, and automated intelligence. Kentik offers robust traffic analysis, predictive network analytics, and extensive integrations, highlighting its strengths in data visibility and integration options.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop could enhance its integration capabilities, broaden data visibility, and expand on predictive analytics. Kentik may improve its user interface for simplicity, reduce the learning curve for new users, and optimize its initial setup process to streamline deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Kentik also offers easy deployment with a focus on data-driven insights and excellent support, yet the learning curve might be slightly steeper due to the comprehensive capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) is viewed as cost-effective with competitive pricing and well-aligned ROI. Kentik involves a higher initial setup cost but promises long-term returns through detailed analytics, with its advanced features potentially justifying the investment for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,954 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (11th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

31st

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kentik is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kentik	1.2%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

ADRIANA SALDARRIAGA TOBON

Sales Manager at IFX NEtworks

Client experience and cybersecurity have improved with an easy setup

The solution is valuable for client experience, especially in the financial sector. The most important feature is cybersecurity. The pricing is good, but the functionality is the most important aspect for clients. The solution is easy to deploy and requires only one person to set up, making it easy and quick. Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"Wire data analytics."

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"The most valuable feature is being able to pull traffic patterns; to and from destinations. We're able to understand where our traffic is going, our top talkers from an AS set, as well as where our traffic's coming from."

"It offers a simple yet powerful feature of classifying applications, going beyond basic statistics."

"Kentik excels in telemetry within data centers and works well in multi-vendor environments."

"One of the valuable features is the intuitive nature of building out reports, and then triggering actions based on specific metrics from those reports. It has a really good UI and the ability to surface data through the reporting functions is pretty good. That's helped a lot in the security space."

"Monitoring operational efficiency is easy."

"Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives."

"Having the API access allows us to do a great deal of automation around a lot of our reporting and management tools."

"We're pretty happy with the API functionality. It's web, and it's very simple to set up queries. It has served us well and you don't need to be an expert on the API or the product to set these things up."

More Kentik pros

Cons

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"They're moving more in a direction where they are saying, "Hey, here's information that you may be interested in or may a need," before the question has to explicitly be asked. Continuing to move in that direction would be a good thing."

"I would like to see them explore the area of cost analysis."

"There is room for improvement around the usability of the API. It's a hugely complex task to call it and you need a lot of backing to be able to do it. I should say, as someone who's not in networking, maybe it's easier for people who are in networking, but for me that one part is not very user-friendly."

"We asked for a way, regarding the potential networks that exist, to hook Kentik up with external tools like peering DBs to correlate things together and see what we can do... This is all in the [next] beta now."

"Sometimes, the tool has complications, so we must deal with the additional support from the tool's end."

"I consider the pricing model as an area for improvement."

"The only downside to Kentik, something that I don't like, is that it's great that it shows you where these anomalies lie, but it's not actionable. Kentik is valuable, don't get me wrong, but if it had an actionable piece to it..."

"I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use. I still go back to the old interface. That's definitely one that they still need to work on. It doesn't seem like everything that you get in the V3, the older interface, is there. For instance, I was trying to add a user or do the administrative tasks in V4, and I couldn't figure out where I was supposed to do that."

More Kentik cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

I would say Kentik's pricing is not cheap. From my perspective as part of the technical team, I would not categorize it as expensive, but I know it is not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kentik?

There's always room for improvements and better relations when using any kind of product. We faced some issues with Kentik UI and alerting, which we asked them to fix, and they succeeded. They have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

We are using Kentik mostly for synthetic tests, and from one last year, network monitoring as well. We are using it for inter DC BGP tests and server monitoring as well.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 15% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

LogicMonitor vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Kentik

Compared 4% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

January 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Kentik

January 2026

Download Kentik product report

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

Kentik's AIOps Network Traffic Intelligence platform unifies network operations, performance, security, and business intelligence.

With a purpose-built big data engine delivered as public or private SaaS, Kentik captures a high-resolution view of actual network traffic data and enriches it with critical application and business data, so every network event or analysis can be tied to revenue & costs, customer & user experience, performance & risk.

Kentik

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik

December 2025

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.