Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kentik based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Zabbix, and Datadog.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Kentik Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kentik, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cloudflare provides automatic security, aggressive caching, and DDoS mitigation for enhanced performance and security. In comparison, Kentik offers deep network visibility and traffic analysis for optimizing performance and detecting anomalies. Cloudflare is cost-effective for website enhancement, while Kentik suits larger enterprises needing detailed insights.
Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring with flexibility and no added cost, ideal for users valuing customization. In comparison, Kentik excels in network traffic analysis, offering strong visualization tools and real-time insights, suited for buyers focused on deep network analysis and targeted ROI.
Datadog excels with extensive monitoring features and integration, suitable for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Kentik prioritizes network performance and offers strong visualization. Datadog supports varied deployments, while Kentik's straightforward pricing benefits network efficiency-driven budgets. Each serves distinct monitoring and analysis needs.
SolarWinds NPM offers robust SNMP support and modular pricing, making it suitable for flexible network growth. In comparison, Kentik emphasizes real-time traffic insights through SaaS, ideal for detailed network behavior analysis. Both solutions cater to different network management needs.
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and intuitive use. In comparison, Kentik focuses on comprehensive traffic analysis. A tech buyer might choose PRTG for cost-effective licensing and setup, while Kentik suits enterprises needing detailed insights and sophisticated visualization tools.
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, while Kentik requires an upfront fee. The significant difference in initial expenses impacts immediate budget considerations for businesses choosing between these monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, while Kentik requires an upfront fee. The significant difference in initial expenses impacts immediate budget considerations for businesses choosing between these monitoring solutions.
ThousandEyes offers comprehensive monitoring and deep analysis across cloud providers and ISPs. In comparison, Kentik focuses on traffic monitoring and visualization with strong flow analysis. ThousandEyes emphasizes application monitoring, while Kentik enhances API usability and provides flexible pricing options.
Kentik's SaaS model and real-time traffic visualization appeal to those seeking flexible and maintenance-free solutions. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers strong threat detection and network management benefits through deep integration within Cisco’s ecosystem, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive security capabilities.
Splunk offers extensive features like log searching and custom dashboards ideal for application performance monitoring. In comparison, Kentik provides detailed network traffic insights and flow optimization. Splunk's integrations enhance data management, while Kentik's competitive pricing appeals to cost-conscious network managers.
Splunk Observability Cloud has higher setup costs, while Kentik offers more affordable initial pricing, highlighting cost differences between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud has higher setup costs, while Kentik offers more affordable initial pricing, highlighting cost differences between the two solutions.
Arbor DDoS excels in comprehensive protection with real-time response, but could improve auto-mitigation and scalability. In comparison, Kentik offers advanced analytics and ease of use, yet needs better alerting features and more intuitive API navigation.
Kentik offers advanced flow analysis for traffic management and security, appealing to organizations with high traffic volumes. In comparison, Auvik provides ease of use and automated network management, attracting buyers seeking comprehensive monitoring without extra device costs.
LogicMonitor offers customizable dashboards and granular alerting, suitable for hybrid environments. In comparison, Kentik provides deep network traffic analysis and intuitive SQL reporting, ideal for detailed network visibility. Tech buyers may choose based on deployment flexibility and detailed network insights.
Kentik's affordability and feature accessibility appeal to organizations focusing on network data utilization. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector attracts those prioritizing comprehensive security through scalable protection and advanced rules, making it a suitable choice despite higher investment considerations for extensive security features.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE appeals to those needing detailed packet and voice traffic analysis, despite a complex interface. In comparison, Kentik offers user-friendly data exploration and real-time insights with customizable dashboards, appealing to buyers seeking intuitive, cloud-based network monitoring solutions.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a significant price difference. Kentik offers a more cost-effective setup solution, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a significant price difference. Kentik offers a more cost-effective setup solution, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
LiveAction LiveNX offers intuitive visualization and straightforward deployment, attracting those who value simplicity and responsive support. In comparison, Kentik's advanced data analytics and scalable architecture appeal to organizations seeking deeper insights and comprehensive features, despite a more complex initial setup and higher investment.
LiveAction LiveNX has an initial setup cost that is generally more substantial compared to Kentik, which tends to offer a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two network monitoring solutions.
LiveAction LiveNX has an initial setup cost that is generally more substantial compared to Kentik, which tends to offer a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two network monitoring solutions.
Catchpoint provides strong synthetic monitoring focused on user experience, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and support. In comparison, Kentik caters to those needing comprehensive network observability with its advanced analytics capabilities, justifying its higher cost with detailed, long-term insights.
vRealize Network Insight provides strong network visualization and monitoring tools with intuitive querying. In comparison, Kentik offers real-time traffic insights and flexible data exploration. A tech buyer might choose vRealize for its user-friendly analysis or Kentik for its cost-effective traffic optimization.
vRealize Network Insight has a higher setup cost, offering advanced network insight features, while Kentik provides a more budget-friendly option suitable for monitoring needs.
vRealize Network Insight has a higher setup cost, offering advanced network insight features, while Kentik provides a more budget-friendly option suitable for monitoring needs.
AppNeta by Broadcom's pricing and support make it appealing, especially for scalable packet-based analysis. In comparison, Kentik excels with real-time data streaming and anomaly detection. A tech buyer might choose Kentik for advanced analytics or AppNeta for cost-effective deployment.
Corero provides affordability and strong support with features like real-time DDoS protection. In comparison, Kentik offers comprehensive features, focusing on network visibility and analytics. Corero's ease of deployment suits security-focused buyers, while Kentik appeals to those prioritizing extensive data analysis capabilities.
Corero requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Kentik offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction highlights Corero's focus on more extensive network protection compared to Kentik's accessible entry-level solution.
Corero requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Kentik offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction highlights Corero's focus on more extensive network protection compared to Kentik's accessible entry-level solution.
Kentik simplifies management with SaaS, offering real-time insights and automation through a flexible API. In comparison, Plixer Scrutinizer excels in detailed NetFlow analysis and strong reporting, focusing on on-premises deployment, making it ideal for security and network performance.
Kentik features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Plixer Scrutinizer may involve a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Users often highlight these differences in their reviews when choosing a network monitoring solution.
Kentik features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Plixer Scrutinizer may involve a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Users often highlight these differences in their reviews when choosing a network monitoring solution.
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor attracts cost-conscious businesses with its affordability and simplicity for essential network monitoring. In comparison, Kentik offers advanced analytics appealing to enterprises with complex requirements, providing superior ROI through its sophisticated data handling and traffic management capabilities.
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor has straightforward setup costs, while Kentik offers a more complex pricing structure. The differences highlight varying approaches in setup and initial investment for both network monitoring solutions.
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor has straightforward setup costs, while Kentik offers a more complex pricing structure. The differences highlight varying approaches in setup and initial investment for both network monitoring solutions.
Kentik's setup costs are lower, making it more accessible, while Observer GigaStor requires a higher initial expense, reflecting its comprehensive analytics capabilities.
Kentik's setup costs are lower, making it more accessible, while Observer GigaStor requires a higher initial expense, reflecting its comprehensive analytics capabilities.
