ERPNext vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Tridots Tech and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Tridots Tech is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Tridots Tech holds a 1.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Tridots Tech users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

ERPNext

Read 2 ERPNext reviews

768 Views
768 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

1,081 Views
1,038 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ERPNext

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and ERPNext compete in the ERP systems category, streamlining business operations. Microsoft Dynamics GP generally has the upper hand with a vast ecosystem and support network, whereas ERPNext is favored for its flexibility and scalability.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers strong financial management, sophisticated supply chain capabilities, and robust integration with Microsoft products. ERPNext provides customizable modules, allowing for broad coverage of business processes like accounting, HR, and project management due to its open-source nature.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics GP requires comprehensive planning and usually professional help for deployment, resulting in longer implementation but benefits from structured support channels. ERPNext, with its cloud-based model, facilitates quicker setup and presents an easier path for small to mid-sized businesses, relying on a community-driven support approach.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP tends to have higher upfront costs because of licensing fees and professional deployment, leading to slower ROI. ERPNext, being open-source, is more cost-effective with lower setup costs and quicker ROI potential, making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed ERPNext vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ERPNext vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ERPNext

Ranking in ERP

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of ERPNext is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.3%
ERPNext	1.4%
Other	97.3%

ERP

Featured Reviews

NagendraCh

Head Of Information Technology at BPM INFOTECH LLP

Installation and integration are areas that are quite easy to manage

With ERPNext, some business challenges will definitely be there. So far, my company has seen that it cannot go for bigger enterprise models, like SAP. With SAP, it is a completely different game, whereas for the SMEs having almost 100 to 500 users, ERPNext can be a good tool. With ERPNext, there can be some challenges in the case of business or routing. The tool is suitable if you have a multi-cloud environment in your company or if there is some company that prefers to be branded as an enterprise business. As there are so many third-party integrations, depending on third-party applications, all those. You know? I mean, you have so many CRM models, but the thing is that with the ERP ERPNext CRM, you can't compare it with Salesforce. For the SME sector, the tool is good. The tool's features are developed for a bigger network. It will take a little bit of time, but as of now, we can see that the tool is good for the SME sector. The tool has not come up with anything for some specific domains, like construction domains. Right now, it is a big challenge to use the tool in the education domain, but right now, the product has resolved it. Many people use the tool since it has a larger network. The tool keeps developing, and it will take time to develop. For the education domain, the tool will have to come up with LMS features and transportation, which make up for small challenges.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool that is customizable based on the business environment."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the product's initial setup a nine on a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

"You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."

"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has supported our compliance with industry regulations completely."

"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."

"It is a tried and tested ERP system which if used correctly, is definitely a very good program for managing all aspects of a business from customer sales, and receivables management, to payable management and finance reporting. So, it's super critical for any mid-sized company."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

"The stability was reliable."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"The look, feel, and color are areas in ERPNext that can be improved."

"The tool has not come up with anything for some specific domains, like construction domains."

"What could be improved is the functionality of Dynamics GP because it requires a lot of development by the programmers and the company in order to integrate into a solution."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a three."

"Price-wise, ERPNext is a cheap product. There are no licensing costs attached to ERPNext since it is an open-source product. You have to pay for the solution's hosting and implementation process."

"The solution's price is steep."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"It is an affordable solution."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Government

Construction Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ERPNext?

It is an open-source tool. Some kinds of plug-ins for the tool are available in the marketplace. ERPNext was developed using Python. Plug-ins are available in the marketplace, and users need to buy...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ERPNext?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ERPNext?

I use the solution in my company to manage additional domains, especially in areas like education and manufacturing.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs ERPNext

Compared 26% of the time

SAP ERP vs ERPNext

Compared 14% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs ERPNext

Compared 13% of the time

Tactive Construction Management Software vs ERPNext

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Business One vs ERPNext

Compared 11% of the time

More ERPNext Competitors

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 20% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 19% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 13% of the time

Odoo vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 12% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 12% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ERP

December 2025

Download ERPNext product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

January 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

ERPNext is an open-source ERP system known for its flexibility and comprehensive capabilities, tailored for various business needs. It integrates multiple business processes into a single platform, enabling seamless operations and efficient resource management for organizations.

ERPNext offers an extensive range of features designed to streamline business operations across sectors, including manufacturing, retail, and services. Its modular structure supports accounting, human resources, inventory, and project management. Recognized for adaptability, ERPNext allows users to customize and extend functionalities, although improvements are encouraged in reporting tools and system scalability.

What are the key features of ERPNext?

Accounting: Streamlines financial processes with tools for invoicing, payments, and financial reporting.
HR and Payroll: Manages employee data, payroll, and attendance efficiently.
Inventory Management: Optimizes stock control with real-time tracking and reporting.
Project Management: Facilitates project planning and progress tracking.

What benefits should users look for in ERPNext reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead with an open-source model, offering substantial savings.
Customization: Allows modifications to meet specific business needs.
Automation: Boosts productivity by automating repetitive tasks.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with external systems to enhance functionality.

ERPNext is leveraged across industries like manufacturing, where it assists in production planning and inventory oversight. In retail, it manages point-of-sale operations and customer engagement. Service industries use ERPNext for project management and resource allocation, ensuring efficient service delivery.

Tridots Tech

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

ERPNext vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

December 2025

Free Report: ERPNext vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about ERPNext vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ERPNext vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.