We performed a comparison between Ephesoft Transact and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good."
"I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."
"Transact's best feature is its ease of customization."
"User-friendly, easy to understand and has many features including the ability to track."
"The workflow system is very intuitive."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It was very smooth and very seamless to create automations."
"We have a very large operational team and we are able to avoid mistakes and ensure accuracy and speed using Pega."
"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."
"Its stability has been good."
"Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow."
"Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted."
"It's not easy to train."
"Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."
"You cannot use a two-dimensional array to read the data."
"The orchestration needs to be better."
"Rule versioning and deployment to enable parallel development could still be improved"
"I would like to see an enhanced auditing feature included."
"Pega has a no-code low-code environment. We do everything based on established rules. You kind-of have to learn how all their rules work and how it works for robotics before you can use the solution effectively."
"It's difficult not knowing when alerts will arrive."
"I would like to improve the tool's integration features and stability."
"I feel like it doesn't get updated frequently enough. There aren't a lot of new features or a clear roadmap for future improvements."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ephesoft Transact is ranked 12th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 3 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews. Ephesoft Transact is rated 7.6, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ephesoft Transact writes "A stable and scalable smart content acquisition and data classification solution with a useful inject feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". Ephesoft Transact is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM. See our Ephesoft Transact vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
