Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eggplant Test vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 9.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Eggplant Test
Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews
  • 3,597 Views
  • 504 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
OpenText Application Qualit...
Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews
  • 5,872 Views
  • 1,762 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Application Quality Management and Eggplant Test compete in the software testing tools category. While OpenText provides robust lifecycle management for large organizations, Eggplant's ease in automating tasks and AI capabilities suggest it might have the upper hand for those focused on automation and agile integration.

Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers comprehensive traceability from requirements to defect management, high customizability, and integration with various automation tools, ideal for managing complete application lifecycles. Eggplant Test provides system-independent GUI automation, advanced image recognition, and easy scriptless automation, making it well-suited for flexible, platform-agnostic testing.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management could enhance usability by addressing high licensing costs, complex project tracking, and limited reporting features. Eggplant Test could improve by refining its pricing structure, expanding complex script support, and enhancing user documentation for smoother adoption and troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management typically deploys on-premises or offers cloud options, with mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Eggplant Test is praised for flexible deployment in both on-premises and public clouds and receives positive feedback for technical support helpfulness.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management's high price point may deter smaller businesses but offers strong ROI for large-scale projects through its extensive features. Eggplant Test is similarly priced, appealing to enterprises focusing on reducing manual efforts and maximizing test accuracy, providing substantial ROI despite its licensing costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.
Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText Application Quality Management improves efficiency, collaboration, and project tracking, leading to substantial time and cost savings.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.
Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is praised for responsive support, though some users experience delays and varying service quality.
I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.
Mirza Hussain
Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
Naresh Nathala
Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
Technical support has been excellent.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Hosney Osman
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
Mirza Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
NN
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
GS
Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.
Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is adaptable, scalable, and flexible, handling large projects well despite minor licensing and performance issues.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.
Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is stable and dependable, with minor issues often tied to network or hardware, not software.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
 

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.
OpenText Application Quality Management faces high costs, poor usability, limited integration, and requires better reporting and performance enhancements.
For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.
Mirza Hussain
Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
Naresh Nathala
Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
Huong Vuong
Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
reviewer1477047
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
Mirza Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
NN
Huong Vuong - PeerSpot reviewer
GS
reviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.
OpenText Application Quality Management is costly for users, prompting negotiations and exploration of alternatives like JIRA due to expenses.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
 

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.
OpenText Application Quality Management excels in traceability, integration, customization, centralized management, and collaboration, enhancing project efficiency and scalability.
It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.
Mirza Hussain
Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
Naresh Nathala
Practice Head - QA at IdeaBytes
For more quotes and insights, download the Eggplant Test report
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
reviewer1477047
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
Mirza Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
NN
GS
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test
Ranking in Test Management Tools
9th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)
OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Quality Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 9.0%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management9.0%
Eggplant Test3.6%
Other87.4%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Mirza Hussain
Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort
I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.
Read full review
GS
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
Manages multiple releases seamlessly
We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise162
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?
The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?
I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. Whe...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test
Compared 18% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test
Compared 16% of the time
Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test Logo
Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test
Compared 9% of the time
Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test Logo
Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test
Compared 7% of the time
Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test
Compared 7% of the time
More Eggplant Test Competitors
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 13% of the time
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 9% of the time
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 9% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 8% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Eggplant Test
January 2026
Eggplant Test reportDownload Eggplant Test product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
January 2026
OpenText Application Quality Management reportDownload OpenText Application Quality Management product report
 

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
 

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?
  • Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
  • Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
  • Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
  • Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
  • Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
  • Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
  • Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Buyer's Guide
Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
December 2025
Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.