We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Eggplant Performance vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We find the solution stable and scalable.""We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

More Eggplant Performance Pros →

"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.""It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.""The stability is okay."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros →

Cons
"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

More Eggplant Performance Cons →

"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""The SAP area could be improved.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."
  • More Eggplant Performance Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
  • "Its licensing cost is very less."
  • "NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."
  • More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to… more »
    Top Answer: 
    One area I can think of to improve is the usability of the reports that we get. They could be simplified and easier to read. The language in the reports, on occasion, can be too technical and is not… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing.
    Top Answer: 
    We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,553
    Comparisons
    1,230
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,453
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    6,269
    Comparisons
    3,692
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    566
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TestPlant eggPlant Performance
    NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
    Learn More
    Overview
    eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

    The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

    Offer
    Learn more about Eggplant Performance
    Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
    Sample Customers
    Cisco
    Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company39%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer17%
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Individual & Family Service11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    566,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Eggplant Performance is ranked 9th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Eggplant Performance is rated 8.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Eggplant Performance writes "We gave them our requirements and they built all the monitoring and alerts that we need, for both our website and product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Eggplant Performance is most compared with Appium, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Akamai CloudTest. See our Eggplant Performance vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

    See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.