Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Keysight Technologies holds a 1.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

556 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 45 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

2,738 Views
2,382 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

OpenText Core Performance E...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Eggplant Performance and OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) compete in the performance testing market. While Eggplant excels in affordability and user experience, OpenText is often favored for its comprehensive features and user satisfaction.

Features: Eggplant Performance simplifies automation and testing with its optical character recognition for object identification. It integrates with tools like Dynatrace for deeper insights and supports functional and performance testing. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) supports high scalability and offers integration with open-source tools like JMeter and Gatling. It includes extensive protocol support, providing flexibility across diverse testing scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Eggplant Performance could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with more extensive monitoring tools and increasing protocol support. Improvement in scalability to handle larger concurrent user volumes would also extend its reach. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) could enhance its user interface for better clarity and improve cloud-related nuances to simplify deployment. Adding more advanced testing scenarios based on current trends would significantly enhance its utility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Eggplant Performance offers simple deployment and excellent customer support, facilitating smooth user experiences. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) provides cloud-based deployment flexibility, simplifying remote access challenges, and its strong support offsets complications, aiding distributed teams.

Pricing and ROI: Eggplant Performance is budget-friendly with a notable ROI due to low operational costs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) demands a higher initial investment, yet its superior capabilities present considerable long-term value, reflecting well on large-scale enterprise testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Performance is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 9.9%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive

I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"The solution is easy to use."

"It's a fast product, so you don't have much trouble in terms of maintenance overhead. You don't want to just look into configuring load generators, look for upgrades, and end up having that take up a lot of your time. With this solution, you just log in and you start using it. This means that there is a huge benefit in terms of the overhead of maintaining the infrastructure and the maintenance effort."

"The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads."

"I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud a ten out of ten for scalability."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines."

"I rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud ten out of ten."

"Both the professional and cloud versions of Micro Focus LoadRunner use the same scripting or programming to execute performance modeling operations. This feature allows users to use various programming languages such as Java, C, or C++, which can run within either of the two environments. This flexibility in the programming language is a strong point of the software."

"The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

Cons

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"Their documentation is not technical enough for us. We would like to have much deeper technical documentation so that we can self-serve without constantly having to go back to them and ask."

"The product must provide agents to monitor servers."

"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too."

"The product price could be more affordable."

"The initial setup is complex, but that is the nature of the technology."

"In terms of new features, they can natively integrate with Chaos engineering tools such as Chaos Monkey and AWS FIS. With LoadRunner, we can generate load, and if Chaos tools are also supported natively, it will help to get everything together."

"I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point."

"It should have a feature to report with a 99.9 percentile success rate."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive in India."

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"The solution is expensive."

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Eggplant Performance?

It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Performance?

The pricing is competitive in India.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Performance?

See all answers

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 29% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 28% of the time

Appium vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 18% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 27% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 21% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 15% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

August 2025

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

August 2025

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Also Known As

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Cisco

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

July 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.