Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Keysight Technologies holds a 1.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

260 Views
166 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 83 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

1,996 Views
931 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 18, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Eggplant Performance compete in the performance testing category. Reports indicate Eggplant Performance stands out, mainly for its advanced AI-driven features.

Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering provides advanced scenario-based testing, vast protocol support, and detailed analytics. Eggplant Performance offers intelligent automation, scriptless testing, and AI-driven insights.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve its deployment process to be more intuitive and seamless. Enhancing AI capabilities would also be beneficial. Additionally, simplifying its complex pricing model could attract more businesses. Eggplant Performance might benefit from expanding its protocol support and enhancing its reporting features. Improving integration with third-party tools could also broaden its market appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Eggplant Performance has a seamless cloud-based deployment that simplifies installation. It offers excellent customer support, enhancing overall service quality. OpenText provides a traditional deployment approach, which may involve a steeper learning curve, but a structured support system offers reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering has competitive pricing but may incur higher setup costs. Eggplant Performance, though potentially more expensive initially, delivers quicker ROI with its automated features reducing long-term costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Performance is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 5.6%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

VictorHorescu

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."

"It is mostly user-friendly and usable."

"The solution supports a number of protocols."

"The most valuable feature is the Vuser protocols."

"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."

"It allows you to work out how well you are doing project-wise because you see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, and whether you have mapped all your requirements to it."

"Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration allows for quick comparison of monitoring and performance results, a feature I highly appreciate."

"The user interface is fine."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

Cons

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."

"The product's scalability must be improved."

"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."

"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."

"It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side."

"We are expecting more flexible to use Jenkins in continuous integration going forward."

"A room for improvement in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is that it should take multiple exhibitions for a particular scenario and have automatic trending for that. This will be a very useful feature that lets users look into how many exhibitions happened for the scenario and their performance, and you should be able to see the data within the Performance Center dashboard. For example, there's one scenario I'm focusing on multiple times in a month, and if I check five times, there's no way for me to see the trend and find out how it went with those five exhibitions. It would be great if the Performance Center has a view of all five exhibitions, particularly transaction by transaction, and how they happened. If Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise shows you the time trends, information about one exhibition to another, and how each performed, it'll be an immense feature, and that should be visible to every user. Reporting should be simpler in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise. If I did a scenario with one exhibition now, and I did that scenario again, then I should be able to schedule that scenario for the exhibition, and if that scenario is executed multiple times, there should be the option to turn it into a single view that shows you all the transactions, how the performance was, what the trend graph is for a particular time, etc."

"The support team needs to be more coordinated."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive in India."

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."

"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money."

"It does everything you could hope for in a performance testing solution. It's not cheap."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"The prices would differ depending on the number of licenses you need. I wouldn't maybe compare it to any other tools. I rate the price as seven out of ten."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Eggplant Performance?

It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Performance?

The pricing is competitive in India.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Performance?

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

In 2019, I was dealing with the costs of LoadRunner. While I don't remember the exact figures, JMeter being free and RPT being cheaper makes them attractive. The high cost of LoadRunner, in contras...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

While I don't see any issues with LoadRunner's functionality, the cost of the tool is a major factor. Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Appium vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 33% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 27% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 27% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 13% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 8% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

May 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Also Known As

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Overview

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.

What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?

Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Cisco

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

June 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Performance vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.