IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

BlazeMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo
5,733 views|4,186 comparisons
Tricentis Logo
6,219 views|3,825 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
BlazeMeter vs. Tricentis NeoLoad
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
610,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations.""The stability is good.""BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool.""It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials.""The feature that stands out the most is their action groups. They act like functions or methods and code, allowing us to reuse portions of our tests. That also means we have a single point for maintenance when updates are required. Instead of updating a hundred different test cases, we update one action group, and the test cases using that action group will update.""They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."

More BlazeMeter Pros →

"Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable.""The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web.""I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.""The stability is okay.""It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros →

Cons
"The reporting capabilities could be improved.""The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff.""Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run.""If the solution had better support and the documentation was efficient it would do better in the market.""The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots.""Having more options for customization would be helpful."

More BlazeMeter Cons →

"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""There were some features that were lacking in Tricentis NeoLoad, e.g. those were more into Citrix and other complicated protocols, which were supported easily by a competitor: Micro Focus LoadRunner. We also need to look into how it integrates with other Tricentis products, because Tricentis did not have a good performance testing tool until now.""Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself.""We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times.""The SAP area could be improved.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."
  • "The solution is free and open source."
  • More BlazeMeter Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its licensing cost is very less."
  • "NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."
  • "Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."
  • "Tricentis NeoLoad price is a benefit of using this tool, it is less expensive than some of the other solutions."
  • More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    610,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We… more »
    Top Answer:They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us.
    Top Answer:The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan.
    Top Answer:The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web.
    Top Answer:Tricentis NeoLoad price is a benefit of using this tool, it is less expensive than some of the other solutions.
    Top Answer:Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the range of codeless scripting such as with terminal emulation apps.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,733
    Comparisons
    4,186
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    564
    Rating
    7.3
    Views
    6,219
    Comparisons
    3,825
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    639
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    JMeter Cloud
    NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
    Learn More
    Overview
    CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery. The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

    The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

    Offer
    Learn more about BlazeMeter
    Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
    Sample Customers
    DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub
    Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Profit25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Media Company13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Retailer16%
    Healthcare Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    BlazeMeter vs. Tricentis NeoLoad
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
    610,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BlazeMeter is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 7 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 7.4, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "The action groups allow us to reuse portions of our test and update multiple tests at once". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Selenium HQ and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Flood and Tricentis Tosca. See our BlazeMeter vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

    See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.