Tricentis NeoLoad Pros review quotes

NalinGoonawardana - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 24, 2023
NeoLoad is actually really good, mainly because they have a world-class support service.
PB
Sep 30, 2021
The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.
SG
Nov 15, 2021
I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SR
Oct 14, 2022
What I found best in Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's better with scripting and load test execution in the load testing environment compared to its competitors. The tool has a better design, scenarios, and model, which I find helpful. I also found the Result Manager a fascinating part of Tricentis NeoLoad because of the way it collates results and presents reports. The straightforward implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad, including ease of use, is also valuable to my team.
SN
Aug 23, 2023
There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side.
Test Process Consultant - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2024
The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution.
GaneshMuralidharan - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2022
Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable.
AF
Apr 28, 2023
The Frameworks feature is valuable. NeoLoad Web and the API are also valuable. It provides API support.
Mayaskar Chandrashekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 29, 2022
Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting.
CB
Oct 8, 2022
The most valuable feature is the ability to execute parallel requests, unlike JMeter and LoadRunner which can only be run sequentially.
 

Tricentis NeoLoad Cons review quotes

NalinGoonawardana - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 24, 2023
NeoLoad can improve the correlation templates, which are specific to frameworks. There's room for improvement in that area.
PB
Sep 30, 2021
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.
SG
Nov 15, 2021
The SAP area could be improved.
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SR
Oct 14, 2022
An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier.
SN
Aug 23, 2023
Connecting with the solution's technical support can be time-consuming. The turnaround time for a ticket raised is around 72 hours, which becomes an issue when working on a huge project in our company.
Test Process Consultant - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2024
Regular and strong support has to be made available by Tricentis during the solution's implementation and initial setup.
GaneshMuralidharan - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2022
There were some features that were lacking in Tricentis NeoLoad, e.g. those were more into Citrix and other complicated protocols, which were supported easily by a competitor: Micro Focus LoadRunner. We also need to look into how it integrates with other Tricentis products, because Tricentis did not have a good performance testing tool until now.
AF
Apr 28, 2023
The overall stability of the GUI should be improved. The GUI component is not stable enough. We have observed crashes several times.
Mayaskar Chandrashekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 29, 2022
The UI lacks sufficient object rendering.
CB
Oct 8, 2022
The solution can be improved by introducing a secure testing feature.