DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Grafana Enterprise Stack comparison

Broadcom and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #55, while Grafana Labs is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Grafana Labs’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

659 Views
401 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 9 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

753 Views
544 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Grafana Enterprise Stack are competing solutions in IT infrastructure monitoring and management. DX Unified Infrastructure Management seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of integration and robust customer service, making it ideal for complex environments.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers comprehensive monitoring tools, automation capabilities, and integration features suited for large-scale operations. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides powerful visualization, supports diverse data sources, and offers customizable dashboards.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could enhance its visualization capabilities, user interface, and flexibility in deployment options. Grafana Enterprise Stack could improve its integration features, expand customer service, and simplify its deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is noted for its straightforward deployment and exceptional support services. Grafana Enterprise Stack offers scalable deployment with moderate complexity, suitable for organizations with skilled IT resources.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management's upfront costs are offset by its high return on investment through enhanced operational efficiency. Grafana Enterprise Stack, priced similarly, is cost-effective for organizations focusing on visual data analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (75th), Server Monitoring (24th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M

Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support

There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.

Read full review

Gregory Diana

Managing Director at Exponential Energy (Pty) Ltd

Offers very good charting capabilities and capable of automatically generating dashboards, even for a large number of data points

In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck. However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."

"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."

"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."

"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."

"Great out-of-the-box capability."

"I recall the initial setup being straightforward."

"What I like about DX Unified Infrastructure Management is that it's a very good product. The feature I found most valuable in the solution is the MCS feature, which is the automatic deployment of the objects you want to monitor. You can set up a system, for example, if it's a Windows machine and I want to test specific devices on it, I could do that through DX Unified Infrastructure Management. That type of deployment is very good because it means you won't miss any monitoring aspect on any server."

"Easy admin functionality. You can quickly do all the admin functionality without reducing cycles."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"It is truly reliable."

"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

Cons

"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."

"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."

"The dashboards need to be improved."

"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."

"We would like the navigation of this solution to be more user friendly for our system administrators."

"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."

"Stability."

"DX UIM's reporting and customization need to be improved."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"I use the tool's free license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

From an analytics perspective, the integration of AI would be a beneficial improvement for Grafana Enterprise Stack.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

Our primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack includes monitoring cluster utilization, taking care of impact avoidance, conducting upgrades, ensuring storage memory does not become full, and id...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 27% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 19% of the time

Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 36% of the time

OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 9% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

May 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

April 2025

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

No data available

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

April 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.