Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveNX comparison

Grafana Labs and BlueCat are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.6, while BlueCat is ranked #35 with an average rating of 9.0. Grafana Labs holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to BlueCat’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 14 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

2,681 Views
2,654 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

5,216 Views
2,504 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in the network monitoring and data visualization category. LiveNX stands out for its robust support and simpler pricing model, while Grafana Enterprise Stack offers better value for advanced users with its comprehensive feature set and data handling capabilities.

Features: LiveNX provides real-time network performance monitoring, detailed traffic analysis, and an effective alerting system. Grafana Enterprise Stack excels with intuitive dashboards, integration with a wide range of data sources, and advanced visualization tools.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could widen its integration capabilities and enhance its user interface flexibility. Grafana Enterprise Stack can improve its learning curve for beginners, provide more customizable alerting features, and offer finer permissions management for large organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX ensures a straightforward deployment process with strong support services, ideal for organizations prioritizing quick setup and responsive assistance. Grafana Enterprise Stack offers flexible deployment across environments along with extensive documentation and community support, suiting technically adept teams.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX presents a transparent pricing model that yields a good ROI for those focused on network performance. Grafana Enterprise Stack, despite higher initial costs, offers a higher long-term ROI due to its extensive feature set, benefiting businesses that need deep analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. LiveNX

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LiveNX

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	0.8%
LiveNX	0.9%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rajan M

Test Lead at Calpine Group

Efficient monitoring and alerting enhance operational insights

With Grafana Enterprise Stack, we can identify issues that New Relic cannot help with. While New Relic requires purchase and supports frontend and backend components, Grafana Enterprise Stack helps identify where issues are occurring. When we need to deep dive into issues, we use New Relic to trace transactions and determine where maximum impact occurs, whether in core size, DB side, or frontend components that slow performance. We first evaluate with Grafana Enterprise Stack, then move to New Relic if we identify performance degradation, such as DB queries taking too much time. Grafana Enterprise Stack responds to queries within 6 to 12 hours. They contact users through email immediately when available. Similarly, New Relic follows the same pattern, responding immediately when requests are raised and resolving issues promptly.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."

"Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources."

"It is very easy to deploy and integrate with any application or infrastructure layer."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"It is truly reliable."

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"There are many positive attributes, and it's the best of the best."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great, but it is far, far away from good and perfect."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

"Productivity has been improved with the use of Grafana Enterprise Stack, but cost savings or return on investment specifics are not clear."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"If Grafana Enterprise Stack could display transaction queries in dashboard format similar to New Relic, it would provide more options and capabilities for users."

"Grafana Enterprise Stack is complex and not easy or simple."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

"The only downside to this software is the price; it's a very pricey solution and very expensive, and it requires a good amount of resources in terms of server memory."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"It's very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I am trying to think about its advanced alerting features; we do not use it too much for that. We do get it to report through to our help desk system and if a threshold gets broken, then a ticket i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have switched to a different suite, focusing on customer edge solutions that are mostly Fortinet. To manage it, I use Grafana Enterprise Stack and a whole bunch of tools that we wrote ourselves. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Grafana Enterprise Stack?

We use Grafana Enterprise Stack in all of our clients. I rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 21% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

AimBetter vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmk vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 4% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

LiveSP vs LiveNX

Compared 3% of the time

Zabbix vs LiveNX

Compared 2% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

August 2026

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

August 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. LiveNX

August 2026

Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.