DigitalOcean vs SAP Business One on AWS comparison

"The user interface is nice, and it is very easy to use. Anyone can use it."

"The Droplets feature is beneficial and easy to use."

"The droplet feature is valuable for hosting my applications as it is particularly cost-effective and serves my needs well."

"The solution's app platform simplifies many tasks a developer must handle manually. For instance, when serving a website, the app platform uses NGINX to manage the app's serving, caching, and automatic rerunning in case of failure."

"DigitalOcean is much cheaper compared to Oracle, Amazon, and Google, making it a better option for a startup."

"The technical support services are good."

"The solution is very stable."

"It's been a good choice for us for some services. We generally have several deployments. For instance, for some static Angular applications, it was a clear choice to run them on Cloudflare, which performs very well in this context. All the assets go on DigitalOcean."

"The most valuable features of SAP Business One on AWS are the CRM and the sales module."

"With the tool, there is no shutdown or breakdown time my company experiences."

"The initial setup is manageable."

"The most valuable aspect is that it is easy to use the software."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It is well-established and caters to our user base efficiently."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Business One is its reporting capability."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"The lack of a proper service provider model ultimately led us to cease operations with DigitalOcean."

"I would like to see an automation feature added to send emails out using the open-source solution."

"I think something needs to be done in terms of technical support."

"The platform could enhance its features, particularly for ETL processes. Additionally, more integration features would be highly beneficial."

"DigitalOcean could offer a pay-as-you-go model similar to AWS, where I would pay for what I use rather than having fixed payments."

"The deployment time can be improved in DigitalOcean. While deployment is automated, the process can take a minute and a half to five minutes, and for more complex applications, this time increases even further. This is not optimal for applications that receive frequent updates."

"The technical support for this solution could be improved."

"Other solutions are proving the monitoring feature, like AWS having GuardDuty and SAP having services for logs and monitoring. DigitalOcean doesn’t have any other benefits."

"I would like to achieve better integration with AWS so that it becomes more interconnected with the SAP system."

"I would like SAP to replace Business One's fixed Web client with a native Web solution. Right now, their remote access is based on RVP. We have to access the solution through a Windows-based client. It's not a native Web interface."

"SAP Business One on AWS could improve by having more customization and more user-friendly automation."

"The solution has a feature that shows you the purchase order that you put on a project and requires you to approve it to be applied to the project, but it doesn't let you move the purchase order to another project. That would be a great feature to have, because if you don't approve it, you have to delete everything and make it again."

"There are limitations of SAP Business One. It's a complex topic, and exploring options like SAP HANA is challenging at the moment. Understanding the limitations of ERP requires thorough research. I suggest conducting some preliminary investigations into ERP products before making a decision. We chose SAP Business One as it caters to SMEs like ours, acknowledging and accepting its limitations. While a larger product exists, switching would entail budget considerations due to the ongoing implementations. Therefore, the current situation with SAP Business One is not a matter of concern."

"There is room for improvement in the manufacturing and logistics areas of SAP Business One on AWS."

"There is a need to make multiple changes in the code to make a few changes in any module of the product."

"It would be better if the solution was on a cloud infrastructure."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"The pricing is cheap."

"The solution provides the cheapest cloud in comparison to the other cloud solutions."

"The price of DigitalOcean could be lower. It is expensive. it's higher than other solutions available in the market. We pay approximately $20 to $25 a month to use the solution. The price we pay is for the shared CPU option."

"There is no licensing fee but there is a subscription cost based on how much RAM and storage you require."

"The program is cheaper than others."

"I am using the cheapest option available, which costs $50 per month."

"The pricing is moderate and reasonable for a mid-tier cloud platform."

"The tool has better pricing models than S/4 HANA."

"The price of the limited version is about 70,000 Pesos ($2,900 USD), and the professional version is about double at 140,000 Pesos ($5,800 USD)."

"The tool's cost is reasonable."

"There is an annual licensing fee, and it changes once you add or remove users. The solution is on the upper-end side and expensive."

"Licenses are available on a monthly or yearly basis, and it costs about $1,200 per license, per user."

"The product is moderately priced."

"We have an annual cost for licensing and storage in AWS."

"The product's license is expensive. It could be cheaper."