TFS and Digital.ai Agility compete in software development and project management. Digital.ai Agility holds the upper hand in features with its advanced capabilities, while TFS is noted for its cost-effectiveness and support.
Features: TFS offers robust integration, flexible project management, and comprehensive version control, particularly within Microsoft environments. In contrast, Digital.ai Agility provides superior project management with sophisticated analytics, adaptability to various agile frameworks, and an emphasis on scalability for complex projects.
Room for Improvement: TFS could enhance its analytics and agile framework adaptability and may need improvement in handling more complex projects. Digital.ai Agility could benefit from improved integration with Microsoft environments, greater cost efficiency, and simplified processes for smaller teams.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS integrates seamlessly in Microsoft-based environments, making deployment straightforward for such ecosystems, with efficient support for Microsoft-savvy businesses. Digital.ai Agility offers an agile-oriented deployment model, focusing on flexibility and expert guidance, with dedicated support tailored for diverse project needs.
Pricing and ROI: TFS presents a more attractive setup cost and fast ROI for teams invested in Microsoft products, making it budget-friendly for businesses with moderate requirements. Digital.ai Agility, while involving higher upfront investments, promises substantial long-term ROI for larger organizations seeking advanced project insights and management capabilities.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| TFS | 4.1% |
| Digital.ai Agility | 2.0% |
| Other | 93.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
Enterprise business agility rests on agile planning that scales and has the flexibility needed to meet the needs of customers and the market. Digital.ai Agility enables organizations to scale up agile from the team level across the product portfolio, improve collaboration and efficiency, and deliver software that provides more value.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
