Cynet and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are two competitive solutions in the cybersecurity market. Kaspersky provides superior features and comprehensive protection, whereas Cynet stands out for cost-effectiveness and customer support.
Features: Cynet is known for its ease of use and integration capabilities. It also includes automated threat detection and response, endpoint visibility, and network traffic analytics. Kaspersky offers advanced features such as superior threat detection, remediation capabilities, and security control via data protection functionalities. It also includes features for behavior analysis and root cause analysis.
Room for Improvement: Cynet could improve by offering more detailed reporting, advanced threat intelligence features, and enhanced user interface customization. Kaspersky needs better user training resources, simplified management of complex settings, and reduced system resource usage for better performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Kaspersky's deployment is more complex due to advanced features but is well-supported by their customer service team.
Pricing and ROI: Cynet is perceived as a more cost-effective solution, offering good value for its price. Although more expensive, Kaspersky provides a strong return on investment due to its extensive features and high-level security.
The return on investment with Cynet is pretty good, as it doesn't require a dedicated resource to manage, being highly automated.
Based on our needs, they schedule remote sessions and resolve the issues.
My experience with the technical support of Cynet is excellent; they are just one click away.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
The solution is highly scalable.
We can deploy Cynet for 50,000 users, and we have deployed it at that scale, with the capability to scale higher to 100,000 users without any challenges.
The solution is easy to scale.
Within six years of usage, we have not had any issues such as outages or downtime.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
One area where Cynet needs improvement is tamper protection for Mac and Linux agents.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
Cynet does not ask for additional costs for add-on features.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
The price of Cynet is reasonable considering its features and support.
These features manage our infrastructure's cybersecurity effectively.
The SOAR function, deception, and forensics are very useful.
The most valuable feature is the UBA (User behavior analysis). It has integration with SIEM solutions, allowing us to share our logs to third-party SIEM servers.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Cynet | 1.7% |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response | 1.1% |
Other | 97.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 29 |
Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
Large Enterprise | 12 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 6 |
Cynet provides comprehensive endpoint protection and advanced threat detection, offering intuitive deployment and monitored support. It ensures real-time visibility and minimal management, enhancing security for diverse and remote teams.
Cynet integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, providing an efficient solution for endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. Its automation, scalability, and stability are key benefits. Users benefit from real-time network visibility, ransomware protection, and deception capabilities. Cynet serves as a robust alternative to CrowdStrike, offering a multifaceted approach to security operations, especially in environments needing continuous threat monitoring and zero-day threat management. Areas needing improvement include mobile device support, enhanced reporting, third-party integrations, and AI-based detection.
What are Cynet's most important features?In the financial sector, Cynet's ability to support efficient threat detection and endpoint protection is crucial. Healthcare industries leverage its data protection features for compliance and security. In manufacturing, real-time threat monitoring supports safeguarding intellectual property. Retail sectors benefit from its scalability and minimal management demands, helping secure diverse, distributed locations.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides robust malware detection, endpoint security, integration with SIEM, control of USB devices, and behavior analysis, deployed on servers, mobile devices, and laptops.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids organizations in scanning environments, blocking sites, handling data transfers, and offering visibility into quarantine systems. Utilizing features such as encryption, machine learning analysis, caching, and automation, Kaspersky ensures enhanced security. The unified agent incorporates antivirus and EDR functionalities, centralizes management, and provides sandbox analysis alongside early-stage threat detection. Automated response capabilities improve efficiency, and the tool's lightweight nature maintains device performance despite high detection rates and advanced threat prevention mechanisms.
What are some of the key features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response can be implemented to protect sensitive data and critical systems against advanced threats. Financial institutions may leverage its high detection rates and behavior analysis to secure transactions and customer information. Healthcare organizations can utilize its sandbox analysis and early-stage threat detection to protect patient data. Retail businesses benefit from the enhanced security and efficient automated responses, ensuring customer data remains safe during transactions.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.