Network administrator at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
Oct 25, 2024
Kaspersky has a better price than other marketplace solutions. Due to this, they are growing significantly. I like the price. I'd rate it nine out of ten.
Overall, I'm satisfied with the price of Kaspersky EDR. It is widely used among our peers and has been effective in detecting and mitigating malware and ransomware threats. However, I have noticed that other EDR tools like Palo Alto EDR offer more advanced AI capabilities and broader threat coverage.
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
I rate the solution's pricing model a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. My company just made a single payment towards the costs related to the licensing of the solution.
I was satisfied with the pricing of Kaspersky. Even now, if Kaspersky had solved our problem, I would have never jumped to SentinelOne. Honestly, I'm not the kind of person who keeps changing products frequently. Once a product stabilizes in our environment and works well, I feel everything is excellent. And Kaspersky performed really well when it was on-premises. On my premises, I had a Kaspersky server that efficiently downloaded updates and signatures. Despite new products with signature-less approaches like SentinelOne, I was content with Kaspersky, and it provided a stable environment within our network. However, there came a time when everyone wanted to upgrade, including our local vendor. They suggested moving to the cloud to remove it from on-premises. We considered this, especially since there was no significant pricing difference, and we could access better options in the cloud. So, we decided to migrate to the cloud. But, unfortunately, after moving to the cloud and deploying agents on our clients, we encountered unexpected disconnection issues. The clients were suddenly getting disconnected, and we had no option but to forcefully restart the machines. We stopped further deployment and everything related to it. We thought to wait for Kaspersky's help in resolving the issue, but regrettably, we didn't receive any assistance from Kaspersky. Consequently, we had to switch to another product, which was SentinelOne.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response provides robust malware detection, endpoint security, integration with SIEM, control of USB devices, and behavior analysis, deployed on servers, mobile devices, and laptops.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids organizations in scanning environments, blocking sites, handling data transfers, and offering visibility into quarantine systems. Utilizing features such as encryption, machine learning analysis, caching, and automation,...
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a very low-cost solution.
Kaspersky has a better price than other marketplace solutions. Due to this, they are growing significantly. I like the price. I'd rate it nine out of ten.
We generally get a license for 36 months. The solution is not cheap, but it is not expensive.
Overall, I'm satisfied with the price of Kaspersky EDR. It is widely used among our peers and has been effective in detecting and mitigating malware and ransomware threats. However, I have noticed that other EDR tools like Palo Alto EDR offer more advanced AI capabilities and broader threat coverage.
The product is cheap.
The tool's pricing is reasonable.
The solution is expensive.
I would rate the pricing a five out of ten; it is neither too cheap nor too expensive.
I rate the solution's pricing model a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. My company just made a single payment towards the costs related to the licensing of the solution.
Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution.
I was satisfied with the pricing of Kaspersky. Even now, if Kaspersky had solved our problem, I would have never jumped to SentinelOne. Honestly, I'm not the kind of person who keeps changing products frequently. Once a product stabilizes in our environment and works well, I feel everything is excellent. And Kaspersky performed really well when it was on-premises. On my premises, I had a Kaspersky server that efficiently downloaded updates and signatures. Despite new products with signature-less approaches like SentinelOne, I was content with Kaspersky, and it provided a stable environment within our network. However, there came a time when everyone wanted to upgrade, including our local vendor. They suggested moving to the cloud to remove it from on-premises. We considered this, especially since there was no significant pricing difference, and we could access better options in the cloud. So, we decided to migrate to the cloud. But, unfortunately, after moving to the cloud and deploying agents on our clients, we encountered unexpected disconnection issues. The clients were suddenly getting disconnected, and we had no option but to forcefully restart the machines. We stopped further deployment and everything related to it. We thought to wait for Kaspersky's help in resolving the issue, but regrettably, we didn't receive any assistance from Kaspersky. Consequently, we had to switch to another product, which was SentinelOne.